IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i4p833-839..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider

Author

Listed:
  • Michael E Vickers
  • Lisa A Taylor

Abstract

In many prey taxa with aposematic coloration, prey defenses also involve signals in other modalities (odors, sounds, etc.), yet the selective forces that have driven multimodality in warning displays are not well understood. One potential hypothesis that has recently received support in the avian literature (but has yet to be examined in invertebrates) is that different signal components may interact synergistically, such that one component of a signal (odor) may trigger a predator’s aversion to another component of a signal (color). Here, we gave jumping spiders (Habronattus trimaculatus) the choice between red or black prey (artificially colored termites) in either the presence or absence of odor from the chemically defended coreid bug (Acanthocephala femorata). When the odor was present, spiders were more likely to avoid the color red compared with when the odor was absent. Interestingly, this pattern only held up when the odor was novel; subsequent exposure to the odor had no effect on color preference. Moreover, this pattern only held for the color red (a color typically used as a warning color and often paired with odor). We replicated this experiment giving spiders the choice between green or black prey, and found that the presence of the odor had no effect on the spiders’ responses to the color green. We discuss these findings in the context of predator psychology and the evolution of prey coloration.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael E Vickers & Lisa A Taylor, 2018. "Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 833-839.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:4:p:833-839.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma C. Siddall & Nicola M. Marples, 2008. "Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and memory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 425-432.
    2. Lisa A. Taylor & Zarreen Amin & Emily B. Maier & Kevin J. Byrne & Nathan I. Morehouse, 2016. "Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 520-529.
    3. John Skelhorn & Christina G. Halpin & Candy Rowe, 2016. "Learning about aposematic prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 955-964.
    4. Lisa A. Taylor & Kevin J. McGraw, 2013. "Male ornamental coloration improves courtship success in a jumping spider, but only in the sun," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 955-967.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi-Yun Kuo & Hao-En Chin & Yu-Zhe Wu, 2023. "Intricate covariation between exploration and avoidance learning in a generalist predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 708-717.
    2. Ben Webster & Erika Qvarfordt & Ulf Olsson & Robert Glinwood, 2013. "Different roles for innate and learnt behavioral responses to odors in insect host location," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 366-372.
    3. Meredith Root-Bernstein, 2012. "The challenges of mixing associational learning theory with information-based decision-making theory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 940-943.
    4. Hannah M. Rowland & Graeme D. Ruxton & John Skelhorn, 2013. "Bitter taste enhances predatory biases against aggregations of prey with warning coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 942-948.
    5. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:4:p:833-839.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.