IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i2p520-529..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa A. Taylor
  • Zarreen Amin
  • Emily B. Maier
  • Kevin J. Byrne
  • Nathan I. Morehouse

Abstract

Understanding the design of prey defenses, such as aposematic colors, involves considering perceptual and cognitive abilities of predators that drive their evolution. Research has focused on avian predators, with little attention to small invertebrate predators. Jumping spiders are abundant and voracious; here, we examined their ability to learn, remember, and generalize color from interactions with aposematic prey. First, we demonstrated that Habronattus pyrrithrix can learn to avoid red, aposematic milkweed bugs. Then, we asked whether exposure to either palatable or unpalatable red prey can drive generalized color biases. Spiders were assigned to one of 3 diets that included exposure to 1) distasteful red milkweed bugs (fed milkweed seeds), 2) palatable red milkweed bugs (fed sunflower seeds), or 3) white-eyed Drosophila only (control). After exposure, we tested spiders for red biases using artificially colored crickets. In our first color-learning experiment, field-collected adult spiders did not exhibit generalized color biases. However, in a second (similar) experiment with lab-raised juveniles, we found evidence of generalized color learning: Group 1 demonstrated red aversion, Group 2 demonstrated red preference, and Group 3 showed no bias. Finally, we examined persistence of memory and found that learned aversions to milkweed-fed bugs lasted less than 2 weeks if they were not continuously reinforced. We discuss our findings in the context of predator psychology and suggest that jumping spider color generalization may differ from that of avian predators. Such invertebrate predators should be considered more when thinking broadly about the evolution of prey color.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa A. Taylor & Zarreen Amin & Emily B. Maier & Kevin J. Byrne & Nathan I. Morehouse, 2016. "Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 520-529.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:520-529.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv182
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christa D. Skow & Elizabeth M. Jakob, 2006. "Jumping spiders attend to context during learned avoidance of aposematic prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 34-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael E Vickers & Lisa A Taylor, 2018. "Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 833-839.
    2. Chi-Yun Kuo & Hao-En Chin & Yu-Zhe Wu, 2023. "Intricate covariation between exploration and avoidance learning in a generalist predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 708-717.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Skelhorn & Christina G. Halpin & Candy Rowe, 2016. "Learning about aposematic prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 955-964.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:520-529.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.