IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p366-372..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different roles for innate and learnt behavioral responses to odors in insect host location

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Webster
  • Erika Qvarfordt
  • Ulf Olsson
  • Robert Glinwood

Abstract

Volatile chemical cues are used by herbivorous insects to locate and identify their host plants. Many species show a preference for volatiles experienced during development in the natal habitat. The reliability of this learnt information, however, may be limited. Many insects develop in restricted habitats, often on a single plant. Large between-plant variability in volatile emission, due to genetic differences and different exposure to biotic and abiotic factors, means that the volatile profile of a single plant may not be representative of the entire species. Insects must, therefore, balance the benefits of learning with the risks associated with its reliability. This is especially important for insects for which habitat exploration is costly. We hypothesize that information gained in the natal habitat is most likely to be utilized in situations where the cost of habitat exploration is lowest. To test this hypothesis, the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae, was reared on artificial diet while exposed to volatiles from its host, broad bean, and an unsuitable host, mustard. When offered the choice between bean and mustard leaves as adults, aphids showed a preference for the leaves whose odor they had experienced during development. When only exposed to volatiles from the two plants, in the absence of cues to indicate proximity or accessibility of the odor source, aphids preferred bean volatiles, regardless of experience. This suggests that information acquired from the natal habitat is only utilized when the perceived cost of habitat assessment is low, with innate preferences dominating otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Webster & Erika Qvarfordt & Ulf Olsson & Robert Glinwood, 2013. "Different roles for innate and learnt behavioral responses to odors in insect host location," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 366-372.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:366-372.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma C. Siddall & Nicola M. Marples, 2008. "Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and memory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 425-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meredith Root-Bernstein, 2012. "The challenges of mixing associational learning theory with information-based decision-making theory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 940-943.
    2. Michael E Vickers & Lisa A Taylor, 2018. "Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 833-839.
    3. Hannah M. Rowland & Graeme D. Ruxton & John Skelhorn, 2013. "Bitter taste enhances predatory biases against aggregations of prey with warning coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 942-948.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:366-372.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.