IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i4p1156-1163..html

Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat

Author

Listed:
  • Cory A. Toth
  • Todd E. Dennis
  • David E. Pattemore
  • Stuart Parsons

Abstract

Males of lek-breeding species defend clustered territories from which they display to visiting females. However, the mechanisms leading to the adoption of clustered male display sites are often unknown. In this study, we examined the possibility of a resource-based lek in New Zealand’s lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) (Mammalia: Chiroptera), by assessing the placement of "singing roosts" used by males in relation to communal roosting sites used by females. The "resource-based lek" model posits that males settle near resources required by females to increase female encounter rates. For most bat species, where females are highly mobile and widely dispersed across landscapes while foraging, communal daytime roosts dominated by females may represent such a resource. Through use of video footage, spatial analyses of singing-roost locations, and passive-integrated transponder tags we confirmed that M. tuberculata employs a lek mating system. We found that male singing roosts were significantly clustered in space, were defended by resident individuals, and were visited by females (who did not receive resources from males) for mating purposes. Transponder records also indicated that some singing roosts were shared between multiple males. Spatial logistic regression indicated that singing-roost locations were associated with communal roosting sites. Communal roosts are selected based on criteria independent of the locations of singing roosts, suggesting that males responded to the location of communal roosts and not the reverse. Mystacina tuberculata thus provides evidence of a resource-based lek, and is only the second bat species worldwide confirmed to use a lek-mating system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cory A. Toth & Todd E. Dennis & David E. Pattemore & Stuart Parsons, 2015. "Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(4), pages 1156-1163.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1156-1163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Tedesco & Jacopo Rodeschini & Philipp Otto, 2025. "Computational Benchmark Study in Spatio‐Temporal Statistics With a Hands‐On Guide to Optimise R," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), July.
    2. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    3. Arii, Ken & Caspersen, John P. & Jones, Trevor A. & Thomas, Sean C., 2008. "A selection harvesting algorithm for use in spatially explicit individual-based forest simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 251-266.
    4. Jiao Jieying & Hu Guanyu & Yan Jun, 2021. "A Bayesian marked spatial point processes model for basketball shot chart," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 77-90, June.
    5. Jonas Rumpf & Helga Weindl & Peter Höppe & Ernst Rauch & Volker Schmidt, 2009. "Tropical cyclone hazard assessment using model-based track simulation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 48(3), pages 383-398, March.
    6. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    7. Leandro, Camila & Jay-Robert, Pierre & Mériguet, Bruno & Houard, Xavier & Renner, Ian W., 2020. "Is my sdm good enough? insights from a citizen science dataset in a point process modeling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    8. Jesper Møller & Farzaneh Safavimanesh & Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen, 2016. "The cylindrical $K$-function and Poisson line cluster point processes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 937-954.
    9. Roba Bairakdar & Debbie Dupuis & Melina Mailhot, 2024. "Deviance Voronoi Residuals for Space-Time Point Process Models: An Application to Earthquake Insurance Risk," Papers 2410.04369, arXiv.org.
    10. Janine B. Illian & David F. R. P. Burslem, 2017. "Improving the usability of spatial point process methodology: an interdisciplinary dialogue between statistics and ecology," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 495-520, October.
    11. Jonas R. Brehmer & Tilmann Gneiting & Marcus Herrmann & Warner Marzocchi & Martin Schlather & Kirstin Strokorb, 2024. "Comparative evaluation of point process forecasts," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 76(1), pages 47-71, February.
    12. Carolina Bello & Thomas W. Crowther & Danielle Leal Ramos & Teresa Morán-López & Marco A. Pizo & Daisy H. Dent, 2024. "Frugivores enhance potential carbon recovery in fragmented landscapes," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(6), pages 636-643, June.
    13. Nicoletta D'Angelo, 2025. "Detecting Changes in Space‐Varying Parameters of Local Poisson Point Processes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), July.
    14. Guangshun Bai & Xuemei Yang & Guangxin Bai & Zhigang Kong & Jieyong Zhu & Shitao Zhang, 2024. "Examining the Controls on the Spatial Distribution of Landslides Triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan Ms 8.0 Earthquake, China, Using Methods of Spatial Point Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    15. Ivan N. Kutyavin & Alexei V. Manov, 2022. "Spatial relationships of trees in middle taiga post-pyrogenic pine forest stands in the European North-East of Russia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(6), pages 228-240.
    16. Pommerening, Arne & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "What mark variograms tell about spatial plant interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 64-72.
    17. Vijay Rajagopal & Gregory Bass & Cameron G Walker & David J Crossman & Amorita Petzer & Anthony Hickey & Ivo Siekmann & Masahiko Hoshijima & Mark H Ellisman & Edmund J Crampin & Christian Soeller, 2015. "Examination of the Effects of Heterogeneous Organization of RyR Clusters, Myofibrils and Mitochondria on Ca2+ Release Patterns in Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Liao, Jinbao & Li, Zhenqing & Quets, Jan J. & Nijs, Ivan, 2013. "Effects of space partitioning in a plant species diversity model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 271-278.
    20. Abdollah Jalilian, 2017. "Modelling and classification of species abundance: a case study in the Barro Colorado Island plot," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2401-2409, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:1156-1163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.