IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i6p807-817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The waiting game: a "battle of waits" between predator and prey

Author

Listed:
  • Don M. Hugie

Abstract

Many prey respond to the presence of a predator by retreating into a shell or burrow, or by taking refuge in some other way that guarantees their safety but restricts further information from being obtained about the predator's continued presence. When this occurs, the individual predator and prey involved become opponents in a "waiting game." The prey must decide how long to wait for the predator to depart before re-emerging and potentially exposing itself to attack. The predator must decide how long to wait for the prey to re-emerge before departing in search of other foraging opportunities. I use a numerical approach to determine the evolutionarily stable waiting strategy of both players and examine the effects of various parameters on the ESS. The model predicts that each player's waiting distribution--the distribution of waiting times one would expect to observe for individuals in that role--will have a characteristic shape: the predator's distribution should resemble a negative exponential function, whereas the waiting time of the prey is predicted to be more variable and follow a positively skewed distribution. The model also predicts that very little overlap will occur between the players' waiting distributions, and that the predator will rarely outwait the prey. Empirical studies relating to the model and comparisons between the waiting game and the asymmetric war of attrition are discussed. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Don M. Hugie, 2003. "The waiting game: a "battle of waits" between predator and prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 807-817, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:807-817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bell, Adrian V. & Rader, Russell B. & Peck, Steven L. & Sih, Andrew, 2009. "The positive effects of negative interactions: Can avoidance of competitors or predators increase resource sampling by prey?," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 52-58.
    2. Srinivasan, Mridula & Grant, William E. & Swannack, Todd M. & Rajan, Jolly, 2010. "Behavioral games involving a clever prey avoiding a clever predator: An individual-based model of dusky dolphins and killer whales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(22), pages 2687-2698.
    3. Andrew T. Kahn & Tegan Dolstra & Michael D. Jennions & Patricia R.Y. Backwell, 2013. "Strategic male courtship effort varies in concert with adaptive shifts in female mating preferences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 906-913.
    4. Guy Beauchamp & Graeme D. Ruxton, 2012. "Changes in antipredator vigilance over time caused by a war of attrition between predator and prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 265-270.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:807-817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.