IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v79y1997i4p1127-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory and Measurement of Exotic Options in U.S. Agricultural Support Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Viswanath Tirupattur
  • Robert J. Hauser
  • Phelim P. Boyle

Abstract

Theoretical models are derived for pricing derivative market instruments with payoff structures identical to those implied by the deficiency, Findley, and loan programs. Numerical approximation methods are used to obtain market premiums for the exotic contingent claims embedded in these types of programs. The application focuses on a comparison of the value of traditional support programs for corn to that of an exchange put offered under the Option Pilot Program. The comparison provides measures of expected cost to the government and of the value of the programs to the producer. Copyright 1997, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Viswanath Tirupattur & Robert J. Hauser & Phelim P. Boyle, 1997. "Theory and Measurement of Exotic Options in U.S. Agricultural Support Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1127-1139.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:79:y:1997:i:4:p:1127-1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1244270
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Calum G. Turvey, 2010. "Biography," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(1), pages 5-20, May.
    2. Calum G. Turvey & Shihong Yin, 2002. "On the Pricing of Cross Currency Futures Options for Canadian Grains and Livestock," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(3), pages 317-332, November.
    3. Stinson, Thomas F. & Coggins, Jay S. & Ramezani, Cyrus A., 1998. "Was Fair Fair To U.S. Corn Growers? An Analysis Of The Payments Offered To Corn Growers Under The 1996 Federal Agricultural Improvement And Reform Act," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20984, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Turvey, Calum G., 2003. "Conceptual Issues In Livestock Insurance," Research Reports 18171, Rutgers University, Food Policy Institute.
    5. Buschena, David E. & Ziegler, Lee, 1999. "Reliability Of Options Markets For Crop Revenue Insurance Rating," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Miller, J. Corey & Barnett, Barry J. & Coble, Keith H., 2003. "Analyzing Producer Preferences for Counter-Cyclical Government Payments," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 671-684, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:79:y:1997:i:4:p:1127-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.