IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v100y2018i1p73-90..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Bank Branching Deregulations on the U.S. Agricultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Amy M G Kandilov
  • Ivan T Kandilov

Abstract

We demonstrate how states that lifted restrictions on interstate bank expansions, thereby improving access to cheaper credit, experienced increased farm sales and net farm income. In our empirical analysis, we use nationwide county-level data from 1970 through 2001 and a difference-in-differences econometric framework, exploiting only within-state variation in banking deregulation, to distinguish the effect of an increase in bank competition from potential confounding factors. By including region-by-year fixed effects in our econometric equation, we compare changes in farm sales and expenditures in states that lift restrictions on interstate banking to changes in states that do not lift such restrictions within the same census region. Our estimates indicate that county-level farm sales increase by about 3.4% and county-level net farm income rises by $1.57 million (in 1982 dollars) after a state deregulates its banking sector by allowing interstate bank expansion. We also find evidence that farm expenditures, in particular expenditures on feed, fuel, machine and equipment rental, as well as interest payments, grew as a result of the banking deregulation. The positive impacts on farm sales, net income, and interest payments are larger in metropolitan counties than in rural counties, consistent with the notion that interstate bank entry following deregulation was concentrated in larger metropolitan markets, leading to a greater reduction in the cost of credit in those areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy M G Kandilov & Ivan T Kandilov, 2018. "The Impact of Bank Branching Deregulations on the U.S. Agricultural Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(1), pages 73-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:100:y:2018:i:1:p:73-90.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aax059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin N. Kim & Ani L. Katchova, 2022. "Agricultural bank acquisitions and postacquisition performance: An examination of the role of shared knowledge," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 743-770, October.
    2. Anders Van Sandt & Craig Wesley Carpenter & Charles M. Tolbert, 2023. "Decomposing local bank impacts with demand thresholds," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(2), pages 333-352, April.
    3. Ty Kreitman & Todd Kuethe & David B. Oppedahl & Francisco Scott, 2022. "The Supply and Demand of Agricultural Loans," Research Working Paper RWP 22-06, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    4. Ty Kreitman & Todd Kuethe & David B. Oppedahl & Francisco Scott, 2022. "The Supply and Demand of Agricultural Loans," Research Working Paper RWP 22-06, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    5. Eric C. Davis & Ani L. Katchova, 2020. "The Impact of Bank Deregulations on Farm Financial Stress and Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Chad Fiechter & Todd Kuethe & David B. Oppedahl, 2021. "Perceived Competition in Agricultural Lending: Stylized Facts and an Agenda for Future Research," Working Paper Series WP-2021-16, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    7. Bretford Griffin & Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak, 2020. "Credit Constraints and Beginning Farmers’ Production in the U.S.: Evidence from Propensity Score Matching with Principal Component Clustering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:100:y:2018:i:1:p:73-90.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.