IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i2p668-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intenational Research Regarding Creative Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Grosanu Adrian

    (Universitatea Babes Bolyai, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor)

  • Rachisan Paula Ramona

    (Universitatea Babes Bolyai, Facultatea de Business)

  • Berinde Sorin Romulus

    (Universitatea Babes Bolyai, Facultatea de Business)

Abstract

Although creative accounting practices are not at all recent, only since 2000 this phenomenon has been widely publicized because of the financial scandals that had erupted worldwide. Obviously, creative accounting practices came to be used with nonchalance at enterprise level, irrespective of their size or the industry within which they operate, fact that appears from different studies undertaken globally in recent years.Even though there are many studies based on the creative accounting phenomenon and on other subjects deriving from it, we considered both interesting and necessary an analysis of the articles that tackle different aspects concerning creative accounting, published after 1990 until now within the highest rated journals in the field of accounting. The main objective of this study is to identify the main research areas in order to emphasize the main existent shortcomings and to outline possible solutions concerning future research directions in this field. Of course, from this main objective derive a few sub-objectives which we will try to achieve by means of the quantitative study. The quantitative study is based on the analysis of researches performed in the filed of creative accounting and its aim is to observe their evolution within the concerned period of time, to analyze the main research directions approached, but also to study the predominant research current and the main type of research applied. Moreover, within this stage we have also analyzed the geographical areas on which the studies performed within the selected articles were based. The present study is far from being exhaustive, but it surely represents a starting point and an informative source for future research in the field of creative accounting. We may conclude that most of the researches conducted within the creative accounting field fall within the main research current, which in our case is positivism. Concerning the type of research, we can observe that the vast majority of articles are of empirical nature, but many theoretical studies have also been published.

Suggested Citation

  • Grosanu Adrian & Rachisan Paula Ramona & Berinde Sorin Romulus, 2012. "Intenational Research Regarding Creative Accounting," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 668-674, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:668-674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n2/101.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivien Beattie & Alan Goodacre, 2006. "A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 65-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantinos Eleftheriou & Patroklos Patsoulis & Michael Polemis, 2023. "Convergence among academic journals in accounting: a note," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1055-1069, February.
    2. Wade D. Cook & Tal Raviv & Alan J. Richardson, 2010. "Aggregating Incomplete Lists of Journal Rankings: An Application to Academic Accounting Journals," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 217-235, September.
    3. Simon Hussain & Lana Liu & Yue Wang & Lingyan Zuo, 2015. "Journal Rankings, Collaborative Research and Publication Strategies: Evidence from China," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 233-255, June.
    4. Tüselmann, Heinz & Sinkovics, Rudolf R. & Pishchulov, Grigory, 2016. "Revisiting the standing of international business journals in the competitive landscape," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 487-498.
    5. Humphrey, Christopher & Gendron, Yves, 2015. "What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-66.
    6. Rowlinson, Michael & Harvey, Charles & Kelly, Aidan & Morris, Huw & Todeva, Emanuela, 2015. "Accounting for research quality: Research audits and the journal rankings debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 2-22.
    7. Alhenawi, Yasser & Hassan, M. Kabir & Hasan, Rashedul, 2022. "Evolution of research in finance over the last two decades – A topographical view," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Hussain, Simon, 2010. "Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Luh-Yu (Louie) Ren, 2016. "A Note about the Finance Journal Rankings and Citation Counts," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 12(Suppl. 1), pages 183–194-1.
    10. Enrico Miersch, 2020. "Research Evaluation of Financial Research - Evidence from a Survey," Credit and Capital Markets, Credit and Capital Markets, vol. 53(3), pages 383-419.
    11. S. Douglas Beets & Andrea S. Kelton & Bruce R. Lewis, 2015. "An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 315-332, January.
    12. Kerl, Alexander & Miersch, Enrico & Walter, Andreas, 2018. "Evaluation of academic finance conferences," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 26-38.
    13. Tucker, Basil P. & Parker, Lee D. & Merchant, Kenneth A., 2016. "With a little help from our friends: An empirical investigation of co-authoring in accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 185-205.
    14. Bajo, Emanuele & Barbi, Massimiliano & Hillier, David, 2020. "Where should I publish to get promoted? A finance journal ranking based on business school promotions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Rosenstreich, Daniela & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2009. "Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 227-239.
    16. Andrea Lionzo, 2017. "Italian academia facing an international scenario: Issues and trends," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 5-22.
    17. Chan, Kam C. & Chan, Kam C. & Seow, Gim S. & Tam, Kinsun, 2009. "Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 875-885, August.
    18. Domingo Docampo & Vicente Safón, 2021. "Journal ratings: a paper affiliation methodology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 8063-8090, September.
    19. Christoph Endenich & Rouven Trapp, 2016. "Cooperation for Publication? An Analysis of Co-authorship Patterns in Leading Accounting Journals," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 613-633, September.
    20. Pajić, Dejan, 2015. "On the stability of citation-based journal rankings," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 990-1006.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    creative accounting; corporate governance; true and fair view; creative acounting techniques; research curent;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:668-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.