IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlhpe/115.00000009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polarization Lost: Exploring the Decline of Ideological Voting in Congress after the Gilded Age

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Chatfield
  • Jeffery A. Jenkins
  • Charles Stewart III

Abstract

We examine the decline in congressional polarization that occurred during the 1920s, as party differences narrowed relative to the high levels that characterized the turn of the twentieth century — a period that has, until recently, been regarded as the high-water mark of partisan polarization in American politics. We note two sets of findings. First, replacement seems to have driven depolarization to a larger extent than conversion, but with different patterns among Republicans and Democrats. Second, both qualitative and roll call evidence suggests that agricultural and tariff policies were key early areas of interparty cooperation, providing important opportunities for cross-party and cross-regional coalitions (like the Farm Bloc and the Progressive Coalition) to form before the Conservative Coalition emerged in the late-1930s.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Chatfield & Jeffery A. Jenkins & Charles Stewart III, 2021. "Polarization Lost: Exploring the Decline of Ideological Voting in Congress after the Gilded Age," Journal of Historical Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 183-214, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000009
    DOI: 10.1561/115.00000009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/115.00000009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/115.00000009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlhpe:115.00000009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.