IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jlqjps/100.00019219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights from the Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition on Polarization in the US Senate

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel M. Butler

Abstract

I study the change in polarization in the US Senate from the period 1947–1966 to 1995–2014. I use a decomposition approach to quantify how much of the increase in polarization between those two periods can be explained by the representation relationship with all voters versus the representation relationship with copartisans. The decomposition also identifies the portion that arose from voters changing positions and how much arose from politicians changing how responsive they are to voters. I find that the representation relationship explains a majority of the increase in polarization. Furthermore, I find that Republicans have become more conservative because they have become more responsive to the positions of their copartisan base. Copartisan sub-constituencies matter for representation and are a source of increased polarization. The data also shows that Democrats have contributed to polarization because the overall electorate in their districts have become more socially liberal.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel M. Butler, 2021. "Insights from the Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition on Polarization in the US Senate," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 16(3), pages 359-386, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00019219
    DOI: 10.1561/100.00019219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00019219
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/100.00019219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00019219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.