Author
Abstract
The paper examines the combination of Google Trends search engine tools and the Decision Making Helper decision support system, taking into account the possibility of solving scientific problems in the compliance organization. The object of research is the compliance organization in the field of funded pension provision. One of the most problematic areas is the lack of research to assess the level of interest of users of the search engine Google Trends in the topic of compliance and the degree of its spread. This hinders the practice of identifying trends and current trends in the development of modern scientific, social and professional thought in the organization of compliance. The research used the tools of the Google Trends search engine based on the frequency of requests for this definition in Ukrainian, Russian and English. According to the frequency of search queries of users, trend models for the considered concepts of "compliance" have been built, having a satisfactory (0.859 and 0.7507) value of the approximation reliability. These two trend models are recommended for predicting the level of user interest in the compliance topic. So, it is modeled the process of assessing the level of interest of users of the Google Trends search engine by the “compliance” concept. This provides the advantage of being able to predict the interest of Google Trends users on the topic. The positive effect of the conducted research is to identify trends and current trends in the development of modern scientific, social and professional thought on compliance. Obtained, using the Decision Making Helper decision support system, an assessment of alternatives for the key components of the organization's compliance in the area of funded pension provision. This is due to the fact that the proposed approach to decision-making has a number of features, including organizational, methodological and process aspects. In particular, the priority of the organizational aspect is determined, it has the characteristics of the most positive decision. This provides benefits such as automating decisions and the ability to prioritize those decisions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other
- J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.