IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2018i38p171-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Development in the Far East: Guardianship or Survival

Author

Listed:
  • Naiden, S.

    (Economic Research Institute Far Eastern Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk, Russia)

Abstract

The national concept of "accelerated development of the Far East" declares the consolidation of population and the growth of human capital through the provision of attractive conditions and high living standards in the region. Together with the state investment into large pretentious projects in social sphere, the decrease of state support to public utilities sector in the region continues. Based on the comparative analysis of state and population expenses on public utilities, the author shows real consequences of changing the parameters of "communal guardianship" for the Far Eastern households' budgets. The author concludes that decreasing the state guardianship in the public utilities sector forms a negative vector of migration mobility. At the same time ignoring the results of unified communal policy, which leads to the destruction of system of state guardianship of social sphere in the region, contradicts the spatially oriented socio-economic policy in the Russian East.

Suggested Citation

  • Naiden, S., 2018. "Social Development in the Far East: Guardianship or Survival," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 171-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:38:p:171-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2018-38-171-178r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    housing and utilities; expenses on public utilities; household budgets; budgets of Russian Federal subjects; state guardianship; Far East;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2018:i:38:p:171-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.