IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v489y2012i7414d10.1038_489027a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethink chemical risk assessments

Author

Listed:
  • George M. Gray

    (George M. Gray is director of the Center for Risk Science and Public Health at George Washington University, Washington DC 20037, USA. In 2005–09, he was assistant administrator to the EPA Office of Research and Development and EPA science adviser.)

  • Joshua T. Cohen

    (Joshua T. Cohen is deputy director of the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, USA. He served on the National Academies committees that reviewed the EPA's dioxin risk assessment in 2006 and its risk-assessment methodologies in 2009.)

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency needs to speed up its risk analyses and address uncertainty, say George M. Gray and Joshua T. Cohen.

Suggested Citation

  • George M. Gray & Joshua T. Cohen, 2012. "Rethink chemical risk assessments," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7414), pages 27-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:489:y:2012:i:7414:d:10.1038_489027a
    DOI: 10.1038/489027a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/489027a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/489027a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aretano, Roberta & Semeraro, Teodoro & Petrosillo, Irene & De Marco, Antonella & Pasimeni, Maria Rita & Zurlini, Giovanni, 2015. "Mapping ecological vulnerability to fire for effective conservation management of natural protected areas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 163-175.
    2. Susan E. Dudley & Zhoudan Xie, 2022. "Nudging the nudger: Toward a choice architecture for regulators," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 261-273, January.
    3. Tine Bizjak & Davor Kontić & Branko Kontić, 2022. "Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:489:y:2012:i:7414:d:10.1038_489027a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.