IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v390y1997i6656d10.1038_36639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Along the leaky pipeline

Author

Listed:
  • Potter Wickware

    (a science writer)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Potter Wickware, 1997. "Along the leaky pipeline," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6656), pages 202-203, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:390:y:1997:i:6656:d:10.1038_36639
    DOI: 10.1038/36639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/36639
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/36639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Zhang & Yuanyuan Shang & Ying Huang & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2022. "Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 145-179, January.
    2. Zhang, Lin & Shang, Yuanyuan & HUANG, Ying & Sivertsen, Gunnar, 2021. "Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on Publons," SocArXiv 4z6w8, Center for Open Science.
    3. Yasaman Sarabi & Matthew Smith, 2023. "Gender diversity and publication activity—an analysis of STEM in the UK," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 321-331.
    4. Sara Poggesi & Michela Mari & Luisa Vita & Lene Foss, 2020. "Women entrepreneurship in STEM fields: literature review and future research avenues," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 17-41, March.
    5. Janet M Box-Steffensmeier & Raphael C Cunha & Roumen A Varbanov & Yee Shwen Hoh & Margaret L Knisley & Mary Alice Holmes, 2015. "Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Mohsen Jadidi & Fariba Karimi & Haiko Lietz & Claudia Wagner, 2018. "Gender Disparities In Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations And Success Of Male And Female Computer Scientists," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03n04), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:390:y:1997:i:6656:d:10.1038_36639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.