IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natsus/v3y2020i1d10.1038_s41893-019-0436-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Robert I. McDonald

    (The Nature Conservancy)

  • Andressa V. Mansur

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig)

  • Fernando Ascensão

    (CIBIO/InBio, Universidade do Porto
    Estación Biológica de Doñana)

  • M’lisa Colbert

    (The Nature of Cities)

  • Katie Crossman

    (The Nature Conservancy)

  • Thomas Elmqvist

    (Stockholm University)

  • Andrew Gonzalez

    (McGill University)

  • Burak Güneralp

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Dagmar Haase

    (Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
    Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research)

  • Maike Hamann

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Oliver Hillel

    (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity)

  • Kangning Huang

    (Yale University)

  • Belinda Kahnt

    (Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • David Maddox

    (The Nature of Cities)

  • Andrea Pacheco

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig)

  • Henrique M. Pereira

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    CIBIO/InBio, Universidade do Porto
    Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg)

  • Karen C. Seto

    (Yale University)

  • Rohan Simkin

    (Yale University)

  • Brenna Walsh

    (Future Earth)

  • Alexandra S. Werner

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig)

  • Carly Ziter

    (Concordia University)

Abstract

By 2030, an additional 1.2 billion people are forecast in urban areas globally. We review the scientific literature (n = 922 studies) to assess direct and indirect impacts of urban growth on habitat and biodiversity. Direct impacts are cumulatively substantial, with 290,000 km2 of natural habitat forecast to be converted to urban land uses between 2000 and 2030. Studies of direct impact are disproportionately from high-income countries. Indirect urban impacts on biodiversity, such as food consumption, affect a greater area than direct impacts, but comparatively few studies (34%) have quantified urban indirect impacts on biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert I. McDonald & Andressa V. Mansur & Fernando Ascensão & M’lisa Colbert & Katie Crossman & Thomas Elmqvist & Andrew Gonzalez & Burak Güneralp & Dagmar Haase & Maike Hamann & Oliver Hillel & Kangn, 2020. "Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 16-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0436-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0436-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0436-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41893-019-0436-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Defne Sunguroğlu Hensel, 2020. "Ecological Prototypes: Initiating Design Innovation in Green Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Yong Zhang & Chao Jiang & Sheng Chen & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hui Shi & Bin Chen & Lingfeng Mao, 2021. "Effects of Landscape Attributes on Campuses Bird Species Richness and Diversity, Implications for Eco-Friendly Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Beaudet, Chloé & Tardieu, Léa & David, Maia, 2022. "Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Ratzke, Leonie, 2023. "Revealing preferences for urban biodiversity as an environmental good," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Wang, Bo & Liang, Youjia & Peng, Shouzhang, 2022. "Harnessing the indirect effect of urban expansion for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in the Loess Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Martin Hartigan & James Fitzsimons & Maree Grenfell & Toby Kent, 2021. "Developing a Metropolitan-Wide Urban Forest Strategy for a Large, Expanding and Densifying Capital City: Lessons from Melbourne, Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Roshan Bhandari & Wenchao Xue & Salvatore G. P. Virdis & Ekbordin Winijkul & Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen & Suraj Joshi, 2023. "Monitoring and Assessing Urbanization Progress in Thailand between 2000 and 2020 Using SDG Indicator 11.3.1," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Margaret Yejide Onanuga & Adebayo Oluwole Eludoyin & Ifeanyi Emmanuel Ofoezie, 2022. "Urbanization and its effects on land and water resources in Ijebuland, southwestern Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 592-616, January.
    9. John B. Vogler & Jelena Vukomanovic, 2021. "Trends in United States Human Footprint Revealed by New Spatial Metrics of Urbanization and Per Capita Land Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Strong, Michael & Silva, Julie A., 2021. "‘We would like this place to be a town’: The benefits and challenges of rural development near protected areas," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    11. Amy K. Hahs & Bertrand Fournier & Myla F. J. Aronson & Charles H. Nilon & Adriana Herrera-Montes & Allyson B. Salisbury & Caragh G. Threlfall & Christine C. Rega-Brodsky & Christopher A. Lepczyk & Fra, 2023. "Urbanisation generates multiple trait syndromes for terrestrial animal taxa worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:3:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41893-019-0436-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.