IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_ncomms14163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt

Author

Listed:
  • David Moreno-Mateos

    (Basque Center for Climate Change–BC3
    IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science
    Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas)

  • Edward B. Barbier

    (University of Wyoming)

  • Peter C. Jones

    (Northern Illinois University)

  • Holly P. Jones

    (Northern Illinois University
    Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability and Energy, Northern Illinois University)

  • James Aronson

    (Missouri Botanical Garden
    Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (UMR 5175, Campus CNRS))

  • José A. López-López

    (School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol)

  • Michelle L. McCrackin

    (Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University)

  • Paula Meli

    (Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas
    Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos A.C.)

  • Daniel Montoya

    (Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modeling, Station D’Ecologie Experimentale du CNRS
    Centre INRA de Dijon)

  • José M. Rey Benayas

    (Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas
    Universidad de Alcalá)

Abstract

Ecosystem recovery from anthropogenic disturbances, either without human intervention or assisted by ecological restoration, is increasingly occurring worldwide. As ecosystems progress through recovery, it is important to estimate any resulting deficit in biodiversity and functions. Here we use data from 3,035 sampling plots worldwide, to quantify the interim reduction of biodiversity and functions occurring during the recovery process (that is, the ‘recovery debt’). Compared with reference levels, recovering ecosystems run annual deficits of 46–51% for organism abundance, 27–33% for species diversity, 32–42% for carbon cycling and 31–41% for nitrogen cycling. Our results are consistent across biomes but not across degrading factors. Our results suggest that recovering and restored ecosystems have less abundance, diversity and cycling of carbon and nitrogen than ‘undisturbed’ ecosystems, and that even if complete recovery is reached, an interim recovery debt will accumulate. Under such circumstances, increasing the quantity of less-functional ecosystems through ecological restoration and offsetting are inadequate alternatives to ecosystem protection.

Suggested Citation

  • David Moreno-Mateos & Edward B. Barbier & Peter C. Jones & Holly P. Jones & James Aronson & José A. López-López & Michelle L. McCrackin & Paula Meli & Daniel Montoya & José M. Rey Benayas, 2017. "Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14163
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14163
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms14163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunming Li & Jianshe Chen & Xiaolin Liao & Aaron P. Ramus & Christine Angelini & Lingli Liu & Brian R. Silliman & Mark D. Bertness & Qiang He, 2023. "Shorebirds-driven trophic cascade helps restore coastal wetland multifunctionality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Pierre Desrochers & Vincent Geloso & Joanna Szurmak, 2021. "Care to Wager Again? An Appraisal of Paul Ehrlich's Counterbet Offer to Julian Simon, Part 2: Critical Analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(2), pages 808-829, March.
    3. Clinton Carbutt & Kevin Kirkman, 2022. "Ecological Grassland Restoration—A South African Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Robert Beyer & Tim Rademacher, 2021. "Species Richness and Carbon Footprints of Vegetable Oils: Can High Yields Outweigh Palm Oil’s Environmental Impact?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Edward B. Barbier, 2017. "Editorial — The Economics of Aquatic Ecosystems: An Introduction to the Special Issue," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-6, April.
    6. Baodi Sun & Yinru Lei & Lijuan Cui & Wei Li & Xiaoming Kang & Manyin Zhang, 2018. "Addressing the Modelling Precision in Evaluating the Ecosystem Services of Coastal Wetlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Manh-Toan Ho & Thanh-Huyen T. Nguyen & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Viet-Phuong La & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "Virtual tree, real impact: how simulated worlds associate with the perception of limited resources," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Diana Turrión & Luna Morcillo & José Antonio Alloza & Alberto Vilagrosa, 2021. "Innovative Techniques for Landscape Recovery after Clay Mining under Mediterranean Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.