IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-40496-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unreprogrammed H3K9me3 prevents minor zygotic genome activation and lineage commitment in SCNT embryos

Author

Listed:
  • Ruimin Xu

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Qianshu Zhu

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Yuyan Zhao

    (Tongji University)

  • Mo Chen

    (Tongji University
    Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University)

  • Lingyue Yang

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Shijun Shen

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Guang Yang

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Zhifei Shi

    (Tongji University)

  • Xiaolei Zhang

    (Tongji University)

  • Qi Shi

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Xiaochen Kou

    (Tongji University)

  • Yanhong Zhao

    (Tongji University)

  • Hong Wang

    (Tongji University)

  • Cizhong Jiang

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Chong Li

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Shaorong Gao

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University
    Tongji University)

  • Xiaoyu Liu

    (Tongji University
    Tongji University)

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) can be used to reprogram differentiated somatic cells to a totipotent state but has poor efficiency in supporting full-term development. H3K9me3 is considered to be an epigenetic barrier to zygotic genomic activation in 2-cell SCNT embryos. However, the mechanism underlying the failure of H3K9me3 reprogramming during SCNT embryo development remains elusive. Here, we perform genome-wide profiling of H3K9me3 in cumulus cell-derived SCNT embryos. We find redundant H3K9me3 marks are closely related to defective minor zygotic genome activation. Moreover, SCNT blastocysts show severely indistinct lineage-specific H3K9me3 deposition. We identify MAX and MCRS1 as potential H3K9me3-related transcription factors and are essential for early embryogenesis. Overexpression of Max and Mcrs1 significantly benefits SCNT embryo development. Notably, MCRS1 partially rescues lineage-specific H3K9me3 allocation, and further improves the efficiency of full-term development. Importantly, our data confirm the conservation of deficient H3K9me3 differentiation in Sertoli cell-derived SCNT embryos, which may be regulated by alternative mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruimin Xu & Qianshu Zhu & Yuyan Zhao & Mo Chen & Lingyue Yang & Shijun Shen & Guang Yang & Zhifei Shi & Xiaolei Zhang & Qi Shi & Xiaochen Kou & Yanhong Zhao & Hong Wang & Cizhong Jiang & Chong Li & Sh, 2023. "Unreprogrammed H3K9me3 prevents minor zygotic genome activation and lineage commitment in SCNT embryos," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-40496-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40496-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40496-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-40496-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. Wilmut & A. E. Schnieke & J. McWhir & A. J. Kind & K. H. S. Campbell, 1997. "Erratum: Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6621), pages 200-200, March.
    2. T. Wakayama & A. C. F. Perry & M. Zuccotti & K. R. Johnson & R. Yanagimachi, 1998. "Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6691), pages 369-374, July.
    3. I. Wilmut & A. E. Schnieke & J. McWhir & A. J. Kind & K. H. S. Campbell, 1997. "Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 385(6619), pages 810-813, February.
    4. Shinya Yamanaka & Helen M. Blau, 2010. "Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7299), pages 704-712, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaodi Liao & Jixiang Zhang & Shiyu Sun & Yuzhuo Li & Yuting Xu & Chunyang Li & Jing Cao & Yanhong Nie & Zhuoyue Niu & Jingwen Liu & Falong Lu & Zhen Liu & Qiang Sun, 2024. "Reprogramming mechanism dissection and trophoblast replacement application in monkey somatic cell nuclear transfer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Sayaka Wakayama & Daiyu Ito & Erika Hayashi & Takashi Ishiuchi & Teruhiko Wakayama, 2022. "Healthy cloned offspring derived from freeze-dried somatic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. M. Samiec & M. Skrzyszowska, 2005. "Microsurgical nuclear transfer by intraooplasmic karyoplast injection as an alternative embryo reconstruction method in somatic cloning of pigs and other mammal species; application value of the metho," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(6), pages 235-242.
    4. Luca Verginer & Massimo Riccaboni, 2021. "Stem cell legislation and its impact on the geographic preferences of stem cell researchers," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(1), pages 163-189, March.
    5. David Johnson & Adam J. Bock, 2017. "Coping with uncertainty: entrepreneurial sensemaking in regenerative medicine venturing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 33-58, February.
    6. Shazia Kiyani & Sohaib Ahmed Hashmi, 2019. "The Emergent Bioethics of Human Cloning Debate in Global Context," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(3), pages 145-153, September.
    7. Shepherd, Richard & Barnett, Julie & Cooper, Helen & Coyle, Adrian & Moran-Ellis, Jo & Senior, Victoria & Walton, Chris, 2007. "Towards an understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 377-392, July.
    8. Y. Tao & W. Han & M. Zhang & Y. Zhang & J. Fang & J. Liu & R. Zhang & H. Chen & F. Fang & N. Tian & D. Huo & Y. Liu & F. Li & J. Ding & P. Maddox-Hyttel & X. Zhang, 2009. "Production of Boer goat (Capra hircus) by nuclear transfer of cultured and cryopreserved fibroblast cells into slaughterhouse-derived oocytes," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(10), pages 448-460.
    9. Wei Li & Qi Long & Hao Wu & Yanshuang Zhou & Lifan Duan & Hao Yuan & Yingzhe Ding & Yile Huang & Yi Wu & Jinyu Huang & Delong Liu & Baodan Chen & Jian Zhang & Juntao Qi & Shiwei Du & Linpeng Li & Yang, 2022. "Nuclear localization of mitochondrial TCA cycle enzymes modulates pluripotency via histone acetylation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Onaizah Onaizah & Liangcheng Xu & Kevin Middleton & Lidan You & Eric Diller, 2020. "Local stimulation of osteocytes using a magnetically actuated oscillating beam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Gleb Zyuz’kov, 2019. "The Foresight for Practical Realization of Research in Regenerative Medicine and Cell Technologies," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 14(1), pages 42-69, March.
    12. M. Samiec & M. Skrzyszowska, 2005. "Molecular conditions of the cell nucleus remodelling/reprogramming process and nuclear-transferred embryo development in the intraooplasmic karyoplast injection technique: a review," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(5), pages 185-195.
    13. Chunhe Li & Jin Wang, 2013. "Quantifying Cell Fate Decisions for Differentiation and Reprogramming of a Human Stem Cell Network: Landscape and Biological Paths," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-40496-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.