IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v13y2023i9d10.1038_s41558-023-01734-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating fossil fuel companies’ alignment with 1.5 °C climate pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Saphira Rekker

    (University of Queensland)

  • Guangwu Chen

    (University of Queensland)

  • Richard Heede

    (Climate Accountability Institute)

  • Matthew C. Ives

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • Belinda Wade

    (University of Queensland)

  • Chris Greig

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

Limiting the global average temperature rise to 1.5 °C requires an unprecedented reduction in fossil fuel use, along with large-scale deployment of CO2 capture and storage. To track the fossil fuel industry and companies against 1.5 °C-consistent pathways, we propose a new methodology that complements existing methodologies in four main ways: (1) it uses publicly available data; (2) focuses on absolute fossil fuel production (as a proxy for embedded emissions) rather than carbon intensities associated with their use; (3) includes coal that is commonly excluded; and (4) is applicable regardless of whether the company has set a target. By applying this method, we evaluated the 142 largest producers of coal, oil and gas against three 1.5 °C IPCC Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP1-1.9, SSP2-1.9 and SSP5-1.9) from 2014 and the International Energy Agency’s Net Zero Emissions pathway from 2020. Between 2014 and 2020, 64%, 63% and 70% of coal, oil and gas companies, respectively, produced more than their production budgets under the IPCC’s middle-of-the-road (SSP2-1.9) Paris Agreement-compliant scenario. In addition, if the 142 companies we examined continued their average growth rate trends from 2010 to 2018, they would produce up to 68%, 42% and 53% more than their cumulative production budgets for coal, oil and gas, respectively, by 2050. By providing such simple metrics, based on publicly available data, our method offers stakeholders a way of easily tracking and comparing the performance of different fossil fuel producers against climate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Saphira Rekker & Guangwu Chen & Richard Heede & Matthew C. Ives & Belinda Wade & Chris Greig, 2023. "Evaluating fossil fuel companies’ alignment with 1.5 °C climate pathways," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(9), pages 927-934, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01734-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01734-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01734-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-023-01734-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01734-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.