IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p16273-16282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting mortality from 57 economic, behavioral, social, and psychological factors

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Puterman

    (School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z1, Canada)

  • Jordan Weiss

    (Population Studies Center and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104)

  • Benjamin A. Hives

    (School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z1, Canada)

  • Alison Gemmill

    (Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205)

  • Deborah Karasek

    (Preterm Birth Initiative, Department of Obstetrics, Genecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158)

  • Wendy Berry Mendes

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143)

  • David H. Rehkopf

    (School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304)

Abstract

Behavioral and social scientists have identified many nonbiological predictors of mortality. An important limitation of much of this research, however, is that risk factors are not studied in comparison with one another or from across different fields of research. It therefore remains unclear which factors should be prioritized for interventions and policy to reduce mortality risk. In the current investigation, we compare 57 factors within a multidisciplinary framework. These include ( i ) adverse socioeconomic and psychosocial experiences during childhood and ( ii ) socioeconomic conditions, ( iii ) health behaviors, ( iv ) social connections, ( v ) psychological characteristics, and ( vi ) adverse experiences during adulthood. The current prospective cohort investigation with 13,611 adults from 52 to 104 y of age (mean age 69.3 y) from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study used weighted traditional (i.e., multivariate Cox regressions) and machine-learning (i.e., lasso, random forest analysis) statistical approaches to identify the leading predictors of mortality over 6 y of follow-up time. We demonstrate that, in addition to the well-established behavioral risk factors of smoking, alcohol abuse, and lack of physical activity, economic (e.g., recent financial difficulties, unemployment history), social (e.g., childhood adversity, divorce history), and psychological (e.g., negative affectivity) factors were also among the strongest predictors of mortality among older American adults. The strength of these predictors should be used to guide future transdisciplinary investigations and intervention studies across the fields of epidemiology, psychology, sociology, economics, and medicine to understand how changes in these factors alter individual mortality risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Puterman & Jordan Weiss & Benjamin A. Hives & Alison Gemmill & Deborah Karasek & Wendy Berry Mendes & David H. Rehkopf, 2020. "Predicting mortality from 57 economic, behavioral, social, and psychological factors," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(28), pages 16273-16282, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:16273-16282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/28/16273.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Grand H.-L. & Sung, Pildoo & Chan, Angelique & Ma, Stefan & Malhotra, Rahul, 2022. "Transitions between social network profiles and their relation with all-cause mortality among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:16273-16282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.