IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2011059070081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does the implementation of IFRS for SMEs bring for agricultural enterprises?

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Bohušová

    (Ústav účetnictví a daní, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Patrik Svoboda

    (Ústav účetnictví a daní, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

Abstract

Agricultural activity is largely different from other activities that the entities perform in order to achieve profit. Unlike other business entities, agricultural produce is significantly dependent on natural climatic conditions, and therefore a particular specialization of agricultural produce depends on geographic location. Agricultural producers use every form of business organization, from small farms to large publicly held corporations. Although most entrepreneurs working in agriculture are small and medium enterprises, the specifics of agriculture are significantly reflected in the financial reporting intended primarily for large corporations traded on the capital markets. Aim of this paper is to review the possibilities of implementation of the provisions relating to agriculture in the frame of IFRS for SMEs into practice of entities concerned whose object is agricultural production and to recommend appropriate application in practice. There are designed specific procedures of recording in relation to the nature of biological assets and agricultural produce and ways of measurement in this paper. The nature of biological assets is considered as distinguishing criterion (consumable assets, bearer assets and consumable assets with long production cycle).

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Bohušová & Patrik Svoboda, 2011. "What does the implementation of IFRS for SMEs bring for agricultural enterprises?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 81-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070081
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070081.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070081.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201159070081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adela Deaconu & Irimie Popa & Anuta Buiga & Melinda Fulop, 2009. "Conceptual and Technical Study Regarding Future Accounting Regulation for SMEs in Europe," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 1(01(530)), pages 18-32, Januaary.
    2. Brian Booth & R. G. Walker, 2003. "Valuation of SGARAs IN THE Wine Industry: Time for Sober Reflection," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 52-60, November.
    3. Kathleen Herbohn, 2006. "Accounting for SGARAs: A Stocktake of Accounting Practice Before Compliance With AASB 141 Agriculture," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 62-76, July.
    4. Adriana Tiron Tudor & Alexandra Muţiu, 2008. "Pro And Contra Opinions Regarding A Sme Accounting Standard," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(10), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan SIROKY & Jirina KRAJCOVA & Jana HAKALOVA, 2016. "The taxation of agricultural land with the use of multi-criteria analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(5), pages 197-204.
    2. Hinke, J. & Stárová, M., 2013. "Application Possibilities and Consequences of Biological Assets and Agricultural Produce Reporting in Accordance with IFRS Principles in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belinda Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst, 2009. "Accounting for SGARAs: Towards Comparability and Consistency," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(2), pages 117-127, June.
    2. Belinda R. Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst, 2009. "The achievability of sustainable reporting practices in agriculture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 155-166, May.
    3. Patrik Svoboda & Hana Bohušová, 2017. "Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Are There Any Differences between Plant and Animal from a Financial Reporting Point of View?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 327-337.
    4. Ricardo Luiz Menezes da Silva & Paula Carolina Ciampaglia Nardi & Maisa de Souza Ribeiro, 2015. "Earnings Management and Valuation of Biological Assets," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Hana BOHUŠOVÁ & Patrik SVOBODA & Danuše NERUDOVÁ, 2012. "Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(11), pages 520-532.
    6. Liyu He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2021. "The impact of managerial discretion on fair value information in the Australian agricultural sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1897-1930, April.
    7. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    8. Arimany, N. & Farreras, M.A. & Rabaseda, J., 2013. "Alejados de la NIC 41: ¿Es correcta la valoración del patrimonio neto de las empresas agrarias?," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(01).
    9. Hana BOHUSOVA & Patrik SVOBODA, 2017. "Will the amendments to the IAS 16 and IAS 41 influence the value of biological assets?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 53-64.
    10. David Procházka, 2011. "The Role of Fair Value Measurement in the Recent Financial Crunch," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 71-88.
    11. Kathleen Herbohn, 2006. "Accounting for SGARAs: A Stocktake of Accounting Practice Before Compliance With AASB 141 Agriculture," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 62-76, July.
    12. Cuzdriorean Dan Dacian & Albu Catalin Nicolae & Albu Nadia, 2012. "The Relationship Between Accounting And Taxation - The Romanian Accounting Environment," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 894-900, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.