IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mul/jb33yl/doi10.1428-75295y2013i3p301-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europe's Austerity Budget for 2014-2020. A Comment over an Anti-Keynesian Budget

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Pini

Abstract

With the European Council in June 2013 a final agreement has been reached on the 2014-2020 Europeanbudget (the Multi-annual Financial Framework, MFF) and in July 2013 the European Parliamentin Strasbourg has approved a political resolution proposed by PPE, S&D, ALDE favourable to this agreement.Before, in April this year, the European Parliament said «no» to the multi-annual budget whichGovernments of the European Union member Countries had agreed upon in February 2013. The changesrealized with the final agreement are minimal, but in some aspect essential, so that a strong message wassent to governments by the only institution in Europe elected by its citizens.The budget for 2014-2020 is unsatisfactory due to both method and content. To method, because itis a deficit budget which leaves the European Commission with little margin of flexibility for anti-recessionmeasures. To content, because it favours redistributive policies between European countries ratherthan policies encouraging growth and employment throughout the European Union. It is an austeritybudget which is deeply anti-Keynesian in a period of serious economic crisis analogous to the great depressionof the 1930s. A policy of growth at a European level is needed in order to cope with the economicdepression, yet a policy of rigour and austerity was proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Pini, 2013. "Europe's Austerity Budget for 2014-2020. A Comment over an Anti-Keynesian Budget," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 301-312.
  • Handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/75295:y:2013:i:3:p:301-312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1428/75295
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1428/75295
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Pini & Roberto Romano, 2014. "DEF 2014: le fonti mancanti della crescita," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 88-125.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:jb33yl:doi:10.1428/75295:y:2013:i:3:p:301-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rivisteweb.it/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.