IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v9y2021i2p188-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Viability Analysis of an Oral Anthelmintic Treatment for Cattle in Feedlot

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Takemi Muchon Nakatani
  • Mario Henrique Conde
  • Mariana Green de Freitas
  • Flávia Carolina Fávero
  • Lucas Chaves de Paula
  • Marcos Da Silva Cabrera
  • Marina de Nadai Bonin Gomes
  • Ricardo Carneiro Brumatti
  • Daniel de Castro Rodrigues
  • Fernando de Almeida Borges

Abstract

The economic viability of a commercial oral anthelmintic suspension containing 10% fenbendazole was evaluated in Angus x Nelore cattle in a feedlot. Two groups of 37 animals (treated and non-treated) were formed. A random-block design was used based on initial weight, egg count per gram of feces (EPG) and carcass grade. EPG counts and the determination of weight were performed on Days 0, 42 and 122. Carcass grade and yield were determined on the day of slaughter. Economic viability was evaluated using cost-effectiveness, sensitivity and financial analyses, considering three economic scenarios- most likely (M), optimistic (O) and pessimistic (P). The anthelmintic achieved 99.89% efficacy regarding EPG reduction. The animals exhibited an increase of 20.7 kg in live weight, 20.2 kg in live weight gain and 0.166 kg in daily weight gain (p < 0.05). No effects were found on yield or carcass grade (p > 0.05). The genus Haemonchus predominated at the onset of the study, whereas only the genus Cooperia was found after treatment. A net return of 14.60 USD per animal was found in the treated group, which remained viable under O, M and P scenarios, with respective differences of 18.92%, 12.86% and 91.15% in gross profit. The treatment was financially superior under all scenarios (real, M, O and P), with reductions of 1.89, 1.04, 0.48 and 16.39 years for the recovery of the initial investment. These results demonstrate the importance of economic analysis methods in the evaluation and selection of anthelmintics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Takemi Muchon Nakatani & Mario Henrique Conde & Mariana Green de Freitas & Flávia Carolina Fávero & Lucas Chaves de Paula & Marcos Da Silva Cabrera & Marina de Nadai Bonin Gomes & Ricardo Ca, 2021. "Economic Viability Analysis of an Oral Anthelmintic Treatment for Cattle in Feedlot," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 188-204, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:188-204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/18032/14265
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/18032
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:188-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.