IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jas888/v8y2020i2p690-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutritional Evaluation of Sugarcane Cultivars for Ruminants

Author

Listed:
  • André Sanches de Avila
  • Maximiliane Alavarse Zambom
  • Gabriele Larissa Hoelscher
  • José Barbosa Duarte Júnior
  • Andressa Faccenda
  • Maria Luiza Fischer
  • Angela Fernanda Storti
  • Josias Luis Fornari
  • Maichel Jhonattas Lange

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritional quality of twenty-nine cultivars of sugarcane. The design was completely randomized, with twenty-nine treatments (cultivars) and three replicates. The evaluations were performed at 540 days after planting during the phenological stage of maturation of sugar cane. Stalk length, number of nodes per plant, internodes length and stalk diameter were evaluated. The stalk samples were crushed, pre-dried and ground for achievement of chemical analysis, carbohydrate fractionation and in vitro digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and posteriorly submitted to Scott-Knott test at 5% probability. Regarding biometric measurements the cultivars differed (P<0.05) for the stalk length, but there was no difference (P>0.05) in the number of nodes as well as in the average internode length and stalk diameter. The content of DM, OM, protein, ether extract, NDF and acid detergent fiber showed differences between the cultivars evaluated (P<0.05). Carbohydrate fractionation also differed between cultivars (P <0.05), being that cultivars RB86 7515, RB92 806 and RB03 6091 presented high fraction of rapidly degradable carbohydrates. The highest values of in vitro digestibility of DM and OM occurred for cultivars RB86 7515, RB92 579 and RB03 6091 (P<0.05). Considering the variables analyzed, the cultivars RB03 6091, RB92 579 and RB86 7515 showed greater concentration of rapidly degradable carbohydrates and greater in vitro digestibility of DM and OM demonstrating potential for use in ruminant feeding.

Suggested Citation

  • André Sanches de Avila & Maximiliane Alavarse Zambom & Gabriele Larissa Hoelscher & José Barbosa Duarte Júnior & Andressa Faccenda & Maria Luiza Fischer & Angela Fernanda Storti & Josias Luis Forna, 2020. "Nutritional Evaluation of Sugarcane Cultivars for Ruminants," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 690-703, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:690-703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/16886/13261
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/16886
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:690-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.