Author
Listed:
- Fabio Seiji dos Santos
- Alexandre Menezes Dias
- Luis Carlos Vinhas Itavo
- Ulysses Cecato
- Andressa Faccenda
- Maximiliane Alavarse Zambom
- Geraldo Tadeu dos Santos
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional value of legumes leucaena and desmodium preserved in hay and silage form. We used a completely randomized design in a 2x2 factorial arrangement with two bulky conservation methods (hay and silage) and two legumes (leucaena and desmodium). For the bulky characterization was determined chemical composition and total digestible nutrients (TDN). For assessing the nutritional value, analysis of in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and cell wall digestibility (IVCWD), and in situ effective degradability of dry matter (EDDM) and crude protein (EDCP) were performed. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test at 5% probability. Due to the characteristics of each specie leucaena presented a higher crude protein (CP) and TDN content compared to desmodium and lower fibrous fractions. The IVDMD presented interaction between the conservation form and forage (P<0.05), where leucaena hay was higher than the others treatments. The IVCWD also presented interaction (P<0.05), and the best values were obtained for leucaena silage. EDDM was superior in leucaena compared to desmodium (P<0.05). Regarding the method of preservation, the EDDM was higher in hay compared to silage. For the EDCP there was an interaction between conservation method and forage, where leucaena silage and hay were similar (P<0.05), but higher than other treatments. Thus, leucaena has a nutritional value higher than desmodium and the conservation of legumes in the hay form presented a higher nutritional value to the conserved as silage.
Suggested Citation
Fabio Seiji dos Santos & Alexandre Menezes Dias & Luis Carlos Vinhas Itavo & Ulysses Cecato & Andressa Faccenda & Maximiliane Alavarse Zambom & Geraldo Tadeu dos Santos, 2020.
"Tropical Legumes Preserved in Silage and Hay Form and Its Nutritional Values in Laboratory Conditions,"
Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 264-275, March.
Handle:
RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:264-275
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jas888:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:264-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jas .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.