IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mhr/jinste/urnsici0932-4569(201412)1704_599rtecot_2.0.tx_2-k.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking the Economic Characteristics of the Major Contractual Damage Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Iljoong Kim
  • Jaehong Kim

Abstract

We clarify the conventional claims concerning the most popular damage measures: expectation damages (ED), constant damages (CD), and reliance damages (RD). We strictly examine strategies versus outcomes in equilibrium and make several new investigations. In terms of equilibrium outcomes, we obtain results that contrast with the existing claims. The main results are: First, ED always results in overperformance. Second, CD, in general, does not guarantee efficient reliance. Third, overbreach need not be realized under RD. Overall, this paper also shows that simultaneity in contract games is more important than has been traditionally supposed in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Iljoong Kim & Jaehong Kim, 2014. "Rethinking the Economic Characteristics of the Major Contractual Damage Measures," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 170(4), pages 599-615, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(201412)170:4_599:rtecot_2.0.tx_2-k
    DOI: 10.1628/093245613X14119692391424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/article/rethinking-the-economic-characteristics-of-the-major-contractual-damage-measures-101628093245614x14119692391424
    Download Restriction: Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1628/093245613X14119692391424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • K19 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(201412)170:4_599:rtecot_2.0.tx_2-k. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Wolpert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/jite .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.