IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v46y2012i2p549-556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dodd-Frank Act: Financial Reform or Business as Usual?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Prasch

Abstract

This paper revisits the premises and promises of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. It argues that it was based on flawed premises and for that reason failed to lay the foundation for substantive reform. By design, and at the behest of the banks, it lacks the explicit rules and bright lines that are critical to lasting and effective financial regulation. Also missing is a plausible end to "Too Big To Fail" financial institutions, over-leverage, and irresponsible (including fraudulent) risk-taking. The article closes with several concrete suggestions for strengthening regulatory agencies and improving financial regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Prasch, 2012. "The Dodd-Frank Act: Financial Reform or Business as Usual?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 549-556.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:46:y:2012:i:2:p:549-556
    DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460230
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aigbe Akhigbe & Anna D. Martin & Ann Marie Whyte, 2016. "Dodd–Frank and risk in the financial services industry," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 395-415, August.
    2. James Weber, 2015. "Identifying and Assessing Managerial Value Orientations: A Cross-Generational Replication Study of Key Organizational Decision-Makers’ Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 493-504, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:46:y:2012:i:2:p:549-556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.