IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v43y2009i4p1025-1042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Policy-Making in (In) Action: The Case of Pharmacy Ownership in North Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Friesner

Abstract

In 1963, the North Dakota Legislature amended the North Dakota Century Code to ensure that all licensed community pharmacies in the State are majority owned by pharmacists registered in the State. During the 2008-2009 legislative session, a debate arose about whether this law should be repealed. Those in favor of repeal attacked the law using the neoclassical arguments of efficiency, competition and lower prices. Those opposed to the law's repeal argued that pharmacists must own pharmacies in order to protect the public's welfare. This paper explores the arguments made for and against this law and draws two major conclusions. First, the arguments made by both sides are flawed because neither side fully incorporates the historical, physical and cultural characteristics of North Dakota communities into their analyses. Second, North Dakota legislators voted overwhelmingly to retain the law. Moreover, prima fascia evidence indicates that the legislators based their decisions on Institutional considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Friesner, 2009. "Institutional Policy-Making in (In) Action: The Case of Pharmacy Ownership in North Dakota," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 1025-1042.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:1025-1042
    DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624430410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/JEI0021-3624430410
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2753/JEI0021-3624430410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murphy, Sean M. & Friesner, Daniel L. & Scott, David M., 2011. "Do In-Kind Benefits Influence Pharmacists’ Labor Supply Decisions?," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-20.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:1025-1042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.