IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v56y2020i11p2461-2473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Government Financial Inflows Effectively Reduce Poverty in Poverty-Stricken Areas? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hanjie Wang
  • Tao Wen
  • Jiali Han

Abstract

Financial assistance has been found to be an important way to help lift people out of poverty, both theoretically and empirically. However, its effective functioning depends on certain basic conditions. Currently, contiguous poverty-stricken areas, the main areas where impoverished communities live in China, are the main battlefield for poverty alleviation. The Chinese government attaches great importance to the effective functioning of rural finance as a tool to combat poverty in these areas and has invested sizable financial resources. However, the actual impact on rural households of financial infusions has not been analyzed. This article sheds empirical light on the issue using data from a survey of rural households in such areas. The results show that the formal financial transfers from the government and informal finance do not effectively reduce poverty there. Rather, they increase income inequality among households. Nonetheless, cultivation of the human capital, material resources, and social capital of rural households plays a positive role in reducing poverty. Thus, our conclusions may be helpful for adjusting rural financial policies in these areas so as to reduce poverty among those who live there.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanjie Wang & Tao Wen & Jiali Han, 2020. "Can Government Financial Inflows Effectively Reduce Poverty in Poverty-Stricken Areas? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 2461-2473, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:11:p:2461-2473
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1618264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1618264
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1618264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:11:p:2461-2473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.