IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v55y2019i11p2523-2543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multicriteria Approach for Modeling Small Enterprise Credit Rating: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Nana Chai
  • Bi Wu
  • Weiwei Yang
  • Baofeng Shi

Abstract

As the engine of China’s economy, small enterprises have been the central to the country’s economic development. However, given the characteristics of the small enterprises loan (i.e., short borrowing period, large volume, small amount and incomplete information), it is extremely challenging for financial institutions to assess their creditworthiness. Thus, it seriously delays and restricts the financing access for small enterprises. In an attempt to relieve the financing difficulty of small enterprises, this article makes use of 687 small wholesale and retail enterprises in a regional commercial bank in China, to establish a credit rating indicator system composed of 17 indicators by using both partial correlation analysis and probit regression. It then utilizes TOPSIS together with fuzzy C-means to score the credit ratings of our sample of small enterprises. With the dual test of default discrimination and ROC curve, the prediction accuracy of the established indicator system has reached 80.10% and 0.917, respectively, indicating the robustness and validity of our credit rating system.

Suggested Citation

  • Nana Chai & Bi Wu & Weiwei Yang & Baofeng Shi, 2019. "A Multicriteria Approach for Modeling Small Enterprise Credit Rating: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 2523-2543, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:55:y:2019:i:11:p:2523-2543
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1577237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1577237
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1577237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi, Baofeng & Zhao, Xue & Wu, Bi & Dong, Yizhe, 2019. "Credit rating and microfinance lending decisions based on loss given default (LGD)," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 124-129.
    2. Francesco Ciampi & Alessandro Giannozzi & Giacomo Marzi & Edward I. Altman, 2021. "Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2141-2188, March.
    3. Sun, Yue & Chai, Nana & Dong, Yizhe & Shi, Baofeng, 2022. "Assessing and predicting small industrial enterprises’ credit ratings: A fuzzy decision-making approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1158-1172.
    4. Marco Locurcio & Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Debora Anelli & Benedetto Manganelli, 2021. "Credit Risk Management of Property Investments through Multi-Criteria Indicators," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Nana Chai & Baofeng Shi & Bin Meng & Yizhe Dong, 2023. "Default Feature Selection in Credit Risk Modeling: Evidence From Chinese Small Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    6. Kubińska, Elżbieta & Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, Magdalena & Andrzejewski, Mariusz & Rozakis, Stelios, 2022. "Incorporating the status quo effect into the decision making process: The case of municipal companies merger," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Shi, Baofeng & Chi, Guotai & Li, Weiping, 2020. "Exploring the mismatch between credit ratings and loss-given-default: A credit risk approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 420-428.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:55:y:2019:i:11:p:2523-2543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.