On the Question of Our Joining the World Trade Organization
In 1992, and again in 1993, I came to the Central Party School to talk about the problems surrounding our country's entrance into the World Trade Organization (WTO). Five years have elapsed since then, and yet the negotiations regarding China's entrance into the WTO have not yet come to a close, and here I am, again, still talking with you about the same problems and raising the same old issues. Indeed, as someone who has taken part in the negotiations on the front line of this whole affair, I truly feel quite ashamed [at the lack of progress]. Today, as I come to talk with you, I would like, on the one hand, to explain to you the situation that we are in, and, on the other hand, I hope to be able to win your understanding and support. I'd like to talk briefly about three issues. First of all, why is it that, after so many years of bargaining and negotiations, we still have not yet come to the heart of the problem? What are the reasons behind this situation? Let me say, however, that my purpose is not to try to find some excuse to exonerate those comrades who, like myself, are in charge of and are responsible for this area of work, for our inability to have completed our task. What I mainly would like to do is see if I can explain to you, my comrades, some of the problems that lie at the deeper levels of the issue. Second, why is it that we are still involved in the negotiations and will continue to be in the negotiations? In other words, what are the pros and consâor advantages and disadvantagesâfor us if we joined the WTO? And why do we believe that the advantages are greater than the disadvantages? Third, I would like to say something about the guidelines that lead us in our negotiations at this time, and the overall shape and conditions that the negotiations are in.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 33 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:33:y:2000:i:1:p:5-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.