IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Restrictive Antonymicity in the French Legal Language

Listed author(s):
  • Nina CUCIUC
Registered author(s):

    From the point of view of the lexicographic tradition, antonymy designates opposite terms. The attempts to treat antonyms from the perspective of the logical opposition failed to bring around the expected results in the strict delimitation of the lexical antonymy from the other types of opposite notions, because those characteristics that need to be considered as contrary have not been established yet. The linguistic criterion is contrary to this point of view as it takes into consideration the lexical distribution and the contextual manifestation of the antonyms in their syntagmatic use of speech: in antonymic contexts of a certain type, with a certain syntactic structure having identical combinatory possibilities. The research of the development of antonymy relations through the derivative links of the opposable terms is an essential aspect of the study of the relations of antonymy in terminologies. The analysis of various examples from the French legal vocabulary proves the fact that antonymy is a pertinent linguistic phenomenon, especially for the terms with a strong qualifying value. The adjectival terms and the nouns formed by adding prefixes act like antonyms under the conditions of changing the contradiction in contrariety.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Published by Cugetarea and indexed by Lumen Department of Economics on Behalf on Mihail Kogalniceanu University in its journal Buletin stiintific - Scientific Bulletin.

    Volume (Year): 19 (2010)
    Issue (Month): (February)
    Pages: 80-95

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:lum:rev5rl:v:19:y:2010:i::p:80-95
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev5rl:v:19:y:2010:i::p:80-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.