IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article


Listed author(s):
  • Cristian Gabriel ROMOCEA

    (Ph.D. in Theology (University of Wales, UK), M.Phil. in International Relations (University of Cambridge). Assistant Professor, Evandeoski Teoloski Fakultet, Osijek, Croatia)

Registered author(s):

    This article examines the access to remedies available to individual actors or groups in cases of violations of the freedom of religion. The emphasis of this article is on the Human Rights Courts, first at the international level and then within the European political and judicial institutions. After outlining the remedy mechanisms available to states, organisations and individuals in relation to religious human rights violations in the international courts, the article will proceed to examine a number of cases and treaties handled by the European Court of Justice, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of Europe and Parliamentary Assembly, regarding the freedom of religion. The argument put forward is that in spite of the universally recognised de jure protection of freedom of religion as a normative principle in international law, this human right is not always recognised de facto by the European regional human rights bodies. Whereas Article 9 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms clearly recognises and protects religious freedom, this author will argue that it has often been used as a way to limit religious freedom rather than offer remedies, protect and expand such freedoms, especially in relation to new and minority religions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi in its journal Jurnalul de Studii Juridice - Drept comunitar. Drept comparat. Drept european - JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES - Comunity Law. Comparative Law. European Law.

    Volume (Year): 3-4 (2010)
    Issue (Month): (December)
    Pages: 85-97

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2010:i::p:85-97
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2010:i::p:85-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.