Author
Abstract
We will make a comparative study on the policies from the member states of the European Union in this field, ending with a conclusion on the Romanian case in the field of research, development, innovation. The starting point of the relation regarding the progresses of the innovative politics for 2009 is the crisis that Romania goes through. In Romania the research-development sector is favored to the detriment of the one of innovation. The ecology, the efficiency and e-government (the increase of efficiency in the public administration) are the directions that have to be followed by the innovational policy from our country. The solutions that have been identified to help Romania enter the research-development-innovation Euromarket are: the development of the educational system, the emphasis of the importance of superior education, of the doctoral schools, the substantial financing of the researchdevelopment- innovation sector, the establishment of a network of efficient public institutions that would deal with the coordination of research and offer specialized counseling to the companies that perform research activities, the singing of partnerships with European and international networks of scientific and technologic research, a relaxed fiscal policy regarding the taxes in this sector, the allocation of a percent close to 3% from GDP, the increase of the number of researchers, the concentration on the development of entrepreneurial universities or of the university-industry consortia, the promotion of the economy ecologization, the insurance of the transparency and objectivity of the administrative system, as well as its simplification, which means that a single public authority should ensure the coordination of the policy in this field.
Suggested Citation
Roxana-Elena LAZAR, 2010.
"THE EUROPEAN POLITICS IN THE FILED OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION.COMPARATIVE STUDY. (English version),"
Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics on Behalf of Petre Andrei University Iasi, vol. 3, pages 107-121, December.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2010:i::p:107-121
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
- K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev4rl:v:3-4:y:2010:i::p:107-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jls.upa.ro/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.