IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v9y2012ip107-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory Online Discussions: The Effect of a Postgraduate Policy on Communication Between Faculty Members and Graduate Learners (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Peter KIRIAKIDIS

    (Ph.D., University Research Reviewer, Walden University. Dr. Peter Kiriakidis, PhD has expertise in higher education educational leadership: (a) chairing comprehensive examinations and dissertation committees; (b) developing curriculum and academic programs; and (c) teaching graduate courses in research, educational leadership in higher education, educational and information technology, online technology, e-commerce, software development, and information systems. Peter is a reviewer of many academic journals. He has presented a plethora of research studies nationally and internationally)

  • Kelley Jo WALTERS

    (Kelley Jo WALTERS – Ph.D., Program Director, Walden University. Kelley Jo Walters, PhD, has over 20 years of educational experience ranging from classroom and graduate level teaching to administration of K-12 and Higher Education. She is currently a Program Director for Walden University’s Ed.D. Programs in Teacher Leadership, Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment, and Special Education. Kelley’s primary research interests include online teaching and learning, curriculum, literacy, and traditional instructional practices. She has written numerous articles)

Abstract

A graduate-level online university located in the northwest area of the United States of America implemented a policy to help graduate learners increase their interactions with faculty and peers. No research had been conducted at the research site to examine the effects of the policy on the communication between faculty and graduate learners. In order to gain some empirical evidence that the policy was effective, the researchers measured the frequency of postings posted by faculty and graduate learners during the duration of randomly selected online classes before and after the implementation of the policy. Grounded in the social learning theory of Vygotsky, the goal of this research was to determine the relationship of the frequency of communication between faculty and graduate learners. Archived data were collected for two cohorts of 235 graduate learners and 16 faculty members from before and after the implementation of the policy. Content analysis procedures were used on the computer-mediated transcripts of the online discussions between faculty and graduate learners within several graduate courses in education offered entirely online. An independent sample t test was utilized to analyze the data and a significant difference between the means of faculty and student postings was found in the two cohorts. The empirical evidence was that the communication policy increased the frequency of posting between faculty and graduate learners. The results of this study can be used by online faculty and university leadership to support the continued advocacy for professional development for faculty.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter KIRIAKIDIS & Kelley Jo WALTERS, 2012. "Mandatory Online Discussions: The Effect of a Postgraduate Policy on Communication Between Faculty Members and Graduate Learners (English version)," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9, pages 107-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2012:i::p:107-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://postmodernopenings.com/archives/759
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    online universities; online discussions; communication; policy; online learning environment; intervention and professional development programs; graduate learners;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2012:i::p:107-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.