IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v9y2017i2p210-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioformation and the Formative Evaluation in Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Maria de Lourdes RODRIGUEZ PERALTA

    (ESIME UC del Instituto Politecnico Nacional)

  • Juan Salvador NAMBO DE LOS SANTOS

    (Centro de Ciencia e Innovacion para la Formacion y el Emprendimiento)

  • Jesus RODRIGUEZ BUENDIA

    (ESIME UC del Instituto Politecnico Nacional)

Abstract

The society demands nowadays that the educational models of the institutions at the university level focus in an integral formation developing knowledge, skills and competences. Nevertheless, the systems of evaluation are not necessarily according to the requirements and methods of teaching and learning in the classroom. This investigation describes the effect of implementing a checklist as a medium so that the student acquires knowledge and gives feedback on the process of teaching and learning, promoting the integral formation. The checklist was designed under the socioformative approach and was used as a mean for the formative evaluation and shared during a course of differential and integral calculus. The qualitative investigation of analytical and descriptive type was based on the action-investigation, with students of the Career of Engineering on Communications and Electronics of Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Among the obtained results, it turns out that the students had a better academic performance and a change of attitude towards the learning of the mathematics in engineering, because they can take the control and the regulation of it. Concluding, we can say that the instruments of evaluation constructed under the socioformative approach promote the formative and participative evaluation and are a good way to improve the academic performance of the student and to develop competences like the collaborative work, the resolution of problems and the autonomy in the learning. It becomes necessary to continue the research regarding the design of instruments of formative evaluation as a didactic medium and the roles that the teachers and students must follow in order to promote an integral formation from the socioformative approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria de Lourdes RODRIGUEZ PERALTA & Juan Salvador NAMBO DE LOS SANTOS & Jesus RODRIGUEZ BUENDIA, 2018. "Socioformation and the Formative Evaluation in Engineering," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 210-227, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:210-227
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/29?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lyudmila Borovyk & Lyudmila Matokhniuk & Kateryna Demyanyuk & Victoriya Shevchuk & Svetlana Pidgaychuk & Oleksandr Danylenko & Anatolii Halimov & Ihor Bloshchynskyi, 2020. "Formation of Professional Imagination in the Process of Implementation of Technical Disciplines with the Aid of Modern Information Technologies," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 20-40, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Socioformation; formative evaluation; integral formation and engineering; mathematics and engineering;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:210-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.