IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v15y2023i4p339-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on PE Teachers’ Perception Regarding the Theoretical Component of the PE Lesson

Author

Listed:
  • Laurentiu Gabriel Talaghir

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati)

  • Bogdan Sorin Olaru

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati)

  • Claudiu Mereuță

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati)

  • Koray Cantez

    (Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Esentepe Kampüsü Kemalpaşa Mahallesi Üniversite Caddesi, Serdivan, Sakarya, 54050, Türkiye)

  • Cristian Mihail Rus

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 11 Carol I Boulevard, Iasi, 700506, Romania)

  • Teodora Mihaela Iconomescu

    (Dunarea de Jos University, Galați)

Abstract

The knowledge-based approach of the PE subject involves the achievement of a mix between a theoretical and a practical component. This approach aims to provide the student with the necessary theoretical notions for an in-depth understanding of the role that practical activity plays in maintaining health. In this way, PE becomes a meaningful school subject for the student. Aim: This paper aims at testing the following hypotheses, built on the conclusions of previous studies: (1) PE teachers consider the theoretical content as less important than the practical one; (2) teachers would rather not deal with the implementation of theoretical content. Method: A data collection tool was devised taking as reference a group of 210 PE teachers, selected by mixed randomization from 7 counties of Romania. The obtained data were then analysed using the statistical programming language R (see 4.1.3). Results and discussions: Teachers value practical content more (4.948) than theoretical content (4.082). And we find this difference even after analysing the data according to the seniority of the teachers within the department. The lowest value is recorded when teachers were asked for their opinion related to the necessity of a PE textbook (3.063). Conclusions and future implications: The two components (theoretical and practical) are not equally appreciated by specialized teachers. This fact highlights the need to emphasise the role of theoretical knowledge within the PE lesson in the training of future teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurentiu Gabriel Talaghir & Bogdan Sorin Olaru & Claudiu Mereuță & Koray Cantez & Cristian Mihail Rus & Teodora Mihaela Iconomescu, 2023. "Study on PE Teachers’ Perception Regarding the Theoretical Component of the PE Lesson," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 339-350, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:339-350
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.4/797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/6411/4576
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.4/797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge-based approach; theoretical notions; physical education; teachers; education; pedagogy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:339-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.