IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v15y2023i1p216-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Questioning in Teaching Mathematics: Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Nina TARASENKOVA

    (Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy)

  • Iryna AKULENKO

    (Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy)

  • Kira HNEZDILOVA

    (Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy)

  • Olga CHASHECHNIKOVA

    (Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Professor, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Ukraine)

  • Vadym KIRMAN

    (PhD of Sciences in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Dnipro Academy of Continuous Education, Ukraine)

  • Zoia SERDIUK

    (PhD of Sciences in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine)

  • Oksana KOLOMIETS

    (PhD of Sciences in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy)

  • Anton ZAPOROZHETS

    (Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine)

Abstract

The paper is an exposure to the latest practices of questioning in teaching and learning math (TLM) on the basis of psychological-semiotic approach. Emphasis is placed on the degree of semantic support of the expected answer when formulating educational questions. The paper explored: whether teachers are able to distinguish between types of questions and to use them in sync with didactic purpose; what types of questions teachers consider to be the most effective; what factors influence this process. To achieve these goals, survey-based research was conducted among 173 high school mathematics teachers across Ukraine. The research proved that, in their majority, teachers are able to correctly distinguish among the types of the questions offered. According to the teachers, questions with full semantic support for the answer are less useful in TLM. The study showed teachers‟ lack of ability to identify the goals of the questions. There has been revealed a gap between the teachers‟ attitude to the expedience of using questions with several possible answers and the practice of their implementation in TLM. The study yielded 35 variables characterizing the current status of the problem. They were optimized to 13 factors. It was stated that questioning should comply with the content of educational material, and the questions formulated with the use of topical vocabulary known to the students are viewed as most cost-effective. The research revealed the significant impact of the number of questions that teachers or students ask. The factor of primary importance appears to be that of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina TARASENKOVA & Iryna AKULENKO & Kira HNEZDILOVA & Olga CHASHECHNIKOVA & Vadym KIRMAN & Zoia SERDIUK & Oksana KOLOMIETS & Anton ZAPOROZHETS, 2023. "Efficient Questioning in Teaching Mathematics: Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 216-246, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:216-246
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/5234/4207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:216-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.