IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev15p/v1y2011ip23-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Litispendenta Comunitara - Community Litispendance (Romanian version)

Author

Listed:
  • Associate Professor Ph.D. Gabriela RADUCAN

    („Titu Maiorescu” University from Bucuresti, Trainer at National Institute of Magistracy)

Abstract

Community litispendance is an autonomous notion regulated by the EC Regulation no. 44/2001, in order to avoid parallel procedures that might result into „incompatible decisions”. When two courts of different member states are seized with the same demand, between the same parties the second one will suspend its' procedure until the settlement of the first one's competence. Although the reason of the existance and necessity of the institution of community litispendance is to prevent contradictory decisions and to insure the implementation of the automatic recognition system of different member states' jugements, if it is expected for this recognition to not be able to take place due to the disrespect from the court a quo of litispendance and connexity criteria, it is natural to understand that the selection of concurrent causes based only on the temporal criteria does not have to take place when the second court exercises its' jurisdiction according to the Regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Associate Professor Ph.D. Gabriela RADUCAN, 2011. "Litispendenta Comunitara - Community Litispendance (Romanian version)," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Politice si Studii Europene/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Political Sciences and European Studies, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 1, pages 23-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev15p:v:1:y:2011:i::p:23-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://edituralumen.ro
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    european judicial cooperation; Bruxelles I Regulation; community litispendance; procedure forclosure; legal suspension.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev15p:v:1:y:2011:i::p:23-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.