IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksp/journ4/v4y2017i2p193-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Communication in Chaos Management and a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan LATIF

    (Kocaeli University, Hereke Vocational School, Turkey.)

  • Tuðçe ELMAS

    (Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey.)

Abstract

Effective communication may be sufficient under normal conditions, but in chaos conditions strategic communication is required. There has been cases of unsuccessful management during times of sudden huge problems due to the use of wrong communication behaviors. This work presents together an example and the requisites of a successful a strategic communicator in chaotic conditions. The study begins with examples of mismanagement behaviors in strategic communication. It establishes a link between chaos management and strategic communication. A successful example on this topic is drawn from an analysis done on the strategic communication behaviors of the vice president of Coca-Cola Company Shay Drohan considering his ability in the use of strategic communication in handling chaotic situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan LATIF & Tuðçe ELMAS, 2017. "Strategic Communication in Chaos Management and a Case Study," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 193-198, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksp:journ4:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:193-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JSAS/article/download/1297/1342
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JSAS/article/view/1297
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myria Allen, 2016. "Strategic Communication for Sustainable Organizations," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-18005-2, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth L. Petrun Sayers & Christopher A. Craig & Emily Skonicki & Grace Gahlon & Susan Gilbertz & Song Feng, 2021. "Evaluating STEM-Based Sustainability Understanding: A Cognitive Mapping Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Helena Carvalho & Luís M. Ferreira & João C. O. Matias, 2017. "A proposed framework to assess upstream supply chain sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2253-2273, December.
    3. Vasja Roblek & Violeta Milenkovska & Vedran Milojica, 2016. "The impact of corporate sustainability in achieving business goals in hotel industry," Tourism and Hospitality Industry 29, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
    4. Olukorede Adewole, 2023. "CSR–brand relationship, brand positioning, and investment risks driven towards climate change mitigation and next perspectives emerging from: “Litigation, projections, pathway, and models”," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-53, January.
    5. Brian P. McCullough & Jamee Pelcher & Sylvia Trendafilova, 2020. "An Exploratory Analysis of the Environmental Sustainability Performance Signaling Communications among North American Sport Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Lea Strottner & Simone Huck-Sandhu, 2021. "Mit Herz und Verstand: Rolle der internen Kommunikation für die Etablierung neuer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien [Implementing change through internal communication: facilitating sustainability strategi," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 197-216, December.
    7. Carolin Lehmann & Dorothea Ruziczka & Tamara Pöhlmann & Simone Huck-Sandhu, 2018. "Von Skeptikern, Sympathisanten und Zuschauern: Stakeholder-Typen und ihre Erwartungen an die Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung [Sceptic, sympathizer or spectator? A typology of stakeholders and thei," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 133-144, December.
    8. Franzisca Weder & Stella Lemke & Amornpan Tungarat, 2019. "(Re)storying Sustainability: The Use of Story Cubes in Narrative Inquiries to Understand Individual Perceptions of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Leiyan Shen & Jianwei Qian & Sandy C. Chen, 2020. "Effective Communication Strategies of Sustainable Hospitality: A Qualitative Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Ionel Jianu & Carmen Ţurlea & Ionela Guşatu, 2015. "The Reporting and Sustainable Business Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Vasileva, Elka & Hristova – Pesheva, Juliya, 2019. "Green communications through ISO 14 000 standards series and other voluntary initiatives," MPRA Paper 106978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Craig, C.A. & Feng, S. & Gilbertz, S., 2019. "Water crisis, drought, and climate change in the southeast United States," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Martin Gerner, 2019. "Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: corporate sustainability across cultures – towards a strategic framework implementation approach," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-34, December.
    14. Myria W. Allen & Christopher A. Craig, 2016. "Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: a communication perspective," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Rakesh Kumar & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2022. "Green Advertising: Examining the Role of Celebrity’s Credibility Using SEM Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 440-459, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Chaos management; strategic communication; Coca-Cola; Case study.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H12 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Crisis Management
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksp:journ4:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:193-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kspjournals.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.