IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v7y2015i1p131-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abusive Terms in Loan Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Niculae

    ()

  • Beatrice-Tanta Strat

    ()

Abstract

This study displays several theoretical and practical remarks on certain abusive terms of loan contracts. Considering the European Law, the main regulation framework is given by Directive 93/13/EEC approved by the Council on the 5th April, 2013, regarding the abusive terms and conditions within the contracts concluded with customers, Directive 2008/48/EC regarding the credit contracts for consumers and the repeal of Directive 87/102/EEC of the Council; Directive 2009/22/EC regarding the cease action related to the protection of consumers „interests. This year, there has been Directive 17/2014 regarding the credit contracts concluded with different consumers for residential real estates and the modification of Directives 2008/48 and 2013/36/EU and EU Regulation no. 1093/2010. Directive 93/13/EEC aims at “eliminating the abusive terms stipulated in the contracts.” We must add that the Romanian trial courts entitled to solve the actions regarding the identification of the abusive terms in credit contracts- as the paper refers only to this type of contracts- took in consideration the jurisprudence of the High Court of Luxembourg.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Niculae & Beatrice-Tanta Strat, 2015. "Abusive Terms in Loan Contracts," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 7(1), pages 131-136, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:131-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe7nr1/niculae1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe7nr1/niculae1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank loan; loan contract; abusive terms; banking risk necessity of Audit Committee; role of Audit Committee;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:131-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adi Sava). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.