IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v89y1996i3-4p339-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Order through Constitutional Choice: A Contractarian Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Berggren, Niclas

Abstract

The present paper consists of two closely related parts: one which outlines a normative criterion for evaluating the legitimacy of constitutional change and one which specifies a particular proposal of a constitution. The criterion used stems directly from the 'pragmatic' brand of contractarianism developed by Buchanan, where an approximate rule of unanimity is utilized. The proposal aims at the highest possible freedom of choice for individuals when it comes to defining the political system of their liking: a core (dealing with public goods and rights) is common for all but everything else can vary between different subconstitutions between which individuals choose. Copyright 1996 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Berggren, Niclas, 1996. "Social Order through Constitutional Choice: A Contractarian Proposal," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 89(3-4), pages 339-361, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:89:y:1996:i:3-4:p:339-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabella, R.V., 2005. "A Nozick-Buchanan contractarian governance as solution to some Invisible Hand failures," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 284-295, May.
    2. João Faria, 1999. "Is There an Optimal Constitution?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 177-184, June.
    3. Anders Bornefalk, 2001. "Constitutional Constraints and Redistributive Activities," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 291-311, December.
    4. Niclas Berggren, 1999. "A Preference-Utilitarian Foundation for the Generality Principle," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 339-353, November.
    5. Niclas Berggren, 2012. "The Calculus of Consent: some Swedish connections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 313-321, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:89:y:1996:i:3-4:p:339-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.