IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v204y2025i1d10.1007_s11127-025-01289-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The legacy of the past: pre-reform party competition and contamination of single-member districts in mixed electoral systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dušan Vučićević

    (University of Belgrade—Faculty of Political Science)

Abstract

Three decades after the rise of mixed electoral systems (MESs), initial expectations of their benefits are mostly tempered. A key reason for the disappointment is the contamination of electoral competition in single-member districts, as parties run nonviable candidates. Strategic incentives to run everywhere vary between subtypes of MESs, being strongest in one-vote MESs and weakest in seat-linkage MESs. However, electoral systems do not emerge in a vacuum, and pre-reform party competition can also decisively influence the post-reform strategic considerations of parties, candidates, and voters. This paper explores the enduring impact of party-system legacies on contamination of single-member-district competition in MESs. I predict relative stability of previous patterns of party competition (in multiparty, two-party, and dominant-party systems), except after critical junctures (one-party-system breakdowns). The empirical analysis covers 26,000 + single-member districts across 141 elections in twenty-five countries spanning seven decades, examining key dependent variables including the effective number of candidates, the ratios of second-to-first loser and third-and-lower-to-first loser, and the vote share of third- and lower-placed candidates. I also assess various electoral, institutional, and contextual factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Dušan Vučićević, 2025. "The legacy of the past: pre-reform party competition and contamination of single-member districts in mixed electoral systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 181-201, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:204:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-025-01289-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-025-01289-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-025-01289-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11127-025-01289-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singer, Matthew M., 2013. "Was Duverger Correct? Single-Member District Election Outcomes in Fifty-three Countries," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 201-220, January.
    2. Fiva, Jon H. & Hix, Simon, 2021. "Electoral Reform and Strategic Coordination," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1782-1791, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucardi, Adrián, 2019. "The Effect of District Magnitude on Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from Two Natural Experiments in Argentina," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 557-577, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:204:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-025-01289-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.