IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jcopol/v48y2025i3d10.1007_s10603-025-09584-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragmenting Consumer Law Through Data Protection and Digital Market Regulations: The DMA, the DSA, the GDPR, and EU Consumer Law

Author

Listed:
  • F. Elizalde

    (IE University
    Koç University)

Abstract

The paper assesses the impact of EU digital legislation on general consumer law. To that end, it addresses the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act in their interaction with the General Data Protection Regulation, as the legal instruments of economic characteristics that seem to confront consumer law more straightforwardly. The main claim that the paper makes is that they fragment consumer law by altering its bases and affecting its principal horizontal provisions, namely, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD, 2005) and the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (UCTD, 1993). The transformation arises from the assumption, by the digital regulations, of the competition concern for market structure and business size while ignoring the nuances among the users of digital services. The societal aims of the EU’s digital policy are also relevant, particularly those concerning personal data. Overall, the digital laws frame a regulation of private relationships that does not pivot on consumption while affecting consumers. Consumer law could be gradually giving way to EU digital private law.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Elizalde, 2025. "Fragmenting Consumer Law Through Data Protection and Digital Market Regulations: The DMA, the DSA, the GDPR, and EU Consumer Law," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 355-389, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:48:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10603-025-09584-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10603-025-09584-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10603-025-09584-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10603-025-09584-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantina Bania, 2023. "Fitting the Digital Markets Act in the existing legal framework: the myth of the “without prejudice” clause," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 116-149, January.
    2. J. Ouyang, 2024. "“Embedded Consumer”: Towards a Constitutional Reframing of the Legal Image of Consumers in EU law," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 395-423, September.
    3. Costa-Cabral, Francisco & Lynskey, Orla, 2017. "Family ties: the intersection between data protection and competition in EU Law," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Kerber & Karsten K. Zolna, 2021. "The German Facebook Case: The Law and Economics of the Relationship between Competition and Data Protection Law," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202114, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard & Shaffique, Mohammed Raiz & Schwed-Shenker, Marie & Mut-Piña, Antoni & van der Hof, Simone & Custers, Bart, 2025. "Science for Robot Policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Beatriz Kira & Vikram Sinha & Sharmadha Srinivasan, 2021. "Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection [Merger policy in digital markets: an ex post assessment]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1360.
    4. Slok-Wodkowska Magdalena & Mazur Joanna, 2021. "The EU's regional trade agreements: How the EU addresses challenges related to digital transformation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(2), pages 105-120, June.
    5. Wolfgang Kerber & Karsten K. Zolna, 2022. "The German Facebook case: the law and economics of the relationship between competition and data protection law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 217-250, October.
    6. Nam, Sangjun & Kwon, Youngsun, 2022. "Quantifying different psychological costs of user behavioral info for overcoming the 'take-it-or-leave-it' condition," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265662, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Maria Luisa Stasi, 2019. "Social media platforms and content exposure: How to restore users’ control," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 20(1), pages 86-110, March.
    8. Marco Botta & Klaus Wiedemann, 2020. "To discriminate or not to discriminate? Personalised pricing in online markets as exploitative abuse of dominance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 381-404, December.
    9. Nam, Sangjun & Kwon, Youngsun, 2024. "Is pay-or-consent for privacy justifiable? Evidence from different users' privacy attitudes toward behavioral data collection in South Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    10. -, 2021. "Digital technologies for a new future," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 46817, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:48:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10603-025-09584-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.