IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jcopol/v44y2021i4d10.1007_s10603-021-09495-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Assessment of the Need for Harmonization of the Legal Framework Concerning Abusive Informal Debt Collection Practices in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • C.-G. Stănescu

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

The loss of jobs and the decline in real incomes caused by the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic have affected consumers’ ability to repay their debts. These have led to high ratios of non-performing loans (NPLs), which affect the stability of the financial industry and undermine economic recovery. The result has been a need for faster debt enforcement and a drastic increase in abusive informal debt collection practices (IDCPs). In the EU, the need to regulate and harmonize abusive IDCPs surfaced in 2018 in connection to the Proposal for a Directive on Credit Servicers, Credit Purchasers and the Recovery of Collateral (CSDP). The directive would enable banks to outsource the servicing of NPLs to a specialized debt collector, but it contained no protection rules against abusive IDCPs. In this article, the researcher critically assesses the need for harmonization of the legal framework concerning abusive IDCPs in the EU, mainly from the standpoint of the initial and current text of the CSDP. Where necessary, the researcher will refer to both historical and comparative law perspectives. The researcher focuses on the legal character of informal debt collection, its relation to financial services, and its potential sui generis character. After that, the researcher will address the arguments for and against establishing pan-EU sector-specific legislation dedicated to IDCPs. Next, the researcher discusses the constitutional authority of the EU to regulate abusive IDCPs. Finally, the researcher will examine the interaction of the CSDP with other consumer (financial) protection instruments to identify the best solution for harmonizing abusive IDCPs at the EU level. The researcher will juxtapose several dichotomies: general versus sector-specific, procedural versus substantive, minimum versus maximum harmonization, and hard versus soft regulation. In the conclusion, the researcher shall synthesize the core problems and suggest an approach.

Suggested Citation

  • C.-G. Stănescu, 2021. "A Critical Assessment of the Need for Harmonization of the Legal Framework Concerning Abusive Informal Debt Collection Practices in the European Union," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 531-557, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:44:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10603-021-09495-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10603-021-09495-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10603-021-09495-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10603-021-09495-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Lavoie, 2012. "Financialization, neo-liberalism, and securitization," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 215-233.
    2. C. Riefa, 2020. "Coronavirus as a Catalyst to Transform Consumer Policy and Enforcement," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 451-461, September.
    3. Pierluigi Vellucci, 2021. "A critique of financial neoliberalism: a perspective combining multidisciplinary methods and commodity markets," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javidanrad, Farzad, 2021. "Paradox of Monetary Profit, Shortage of Money in Circulation & Financialisation," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1365, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    2. Célia Taborda Silva, 2021. "Democracy and Popular Protest in Europe: The Iberian Case (2011)," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, July -Dec.
    3. Lino Sau, 2022. "Schumpeter vs. Minsky on the Evolution of Capitalism and Entrepreneurship," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 56(1), pages 245-272, June.
    4. Lainé, Michael, 2023. "How to reconcile actual climate change mitigation with prosperity? A proposal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    5. Detzer, Daniel, 2019. "Financialization made in Germany: A review," IPE Working Papers 122/2019, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    6. Michael Lainé, 2023. "How to reconcile actual climate change mitigation with prosperity? A proposal," Post-Print hal-04265121, HAL.
    7. Photis Lysandrou & Taimaz Ranjbaran, 2021. "Financialisation reinforced: the dual legacy of the covid pandemic," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 589-606, December.
    8. Stefanos Ioannou & Dariusz Wójcik, 2019. "On financialization and its future," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 263-271, February.
    9. Ngwu, Franklin N. & Chen, Zheyang, 2016. "Regulation of securitisation in China: Learning from the US experience," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 477-488.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:44:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10603-021-09495-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.