IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v197y2025i4d10.1007_s10551-024-05767-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After the Accident: Is There a Blame Bias Against the Airline?

Author

Listed:
  • Dwane H. Dean

    (Frostburg State University)

Abstract

Based on the deontological ethical perspective and concepts from blame psychology such as the defensive attribution hypothesis and culpable control, it is argued that people are predisposed to blame a transportation company when it is involved in an accident. This was tested in a scenario of an airline accident of uncertain cause, finding that respondents blamed the airline the most among a list of five blamable entities (pilots, mechanics-maintenance-inspectors, the weather, ground crew-air traffic control, and airline). Additionally, based on the virtue theory of ethics and the moral character perspective of blame psychology, it was hypothesized that manipulation of the virtue of the airline (mercenary versus altruistic) would result in less blame assigned to the altruistic airline in a quasi-experiment where the other factor was outcome of the accident (safe landing with a few injuries versus crash with many fatalities). However, the two factors significantly interacted in an unexpected way. The mercenary airline suffering a crash was blamed less than the altruistic airline that crashed, while the mercenary airline that safely landed was blamed more than the altruistic airline that safely landed. The managerial implications of blame bias toward the company are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwane H. Dean, 2025. "After the Accident: Is There a Blame Bias Against the Airline?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 841-853, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:197:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05767-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05767-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05767-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05767-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gazi Islam, 2020. "Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-02877566, HAL.
    2. Gazi Islam, 2020. "Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Gazi Islam, 2020. "Psychology and Business Ethics: A Multi-level Research Agenda," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02877566, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parisa Dashtipour & Nathan Gerard & Duarte Rolo, 2025. "Toward an Ethics of Ambiguity in Critical Work and Organizational Psychology: From ‘Blank’ to ‘Troubled’ Subjectivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 219-230, March.
    2. Arménio Rego & Ana I. Melo & Dustin J. Bluhm & Miguel Pina Cunha & Dálcio Reis Júnior, 2021. "Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 669-686, December.
    3. Nelson Borges Amaral & Jinfeng Jiao, 2023. "Responses to Ethical Scenarios: The Impact of Trade-Off Salience on Competing Construal Level Effects," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 745-762, March.
    4. Vasco Santos & Nuno Almeida, 2022. "Ethical Marketing Model for Luxury Hotel Chains: Development and Validation of a Performance Evaluation Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Kelly Raz & Alison R. Fragale & Liat Levontin, 2023. "Who Do I (Dis)Trust and Monitor for Ethical Misconduct? Status, Power, and the Structural Paradox," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 443-464, January.
    6. Zhe Zhang & Juan Wang & Ming Jia, 2022. "Multilevel Examination of How and When Socially Responsible Human Resource Management Improves the Well-Being of Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 55-71, February.
    7. Koo, KwangJoo (KJ) & Kim, Jae B., 2025. "Managerial pessimism and investment in corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Anika Schumacher & Robert Mai, 2024. "Organizational Top Dog (vs. Underdog) Narratives Increase the Punishment of Corporate Moral Transgressions: When Dominance is a Liability and Prestige is an Asset," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 19-36, September.
    9. John G. Cullen, 2022. "Moral Recovery and Ethical Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 485-497, January.
    10. Kristin Lee Sotak & Andra Serban & Barry A. Friedman & Michael Palanski, 2024. "Perceptions of Ethicality: The Role of Attire Style, Attire Appropriateness, and Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 149-175, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:197:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05767-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.