IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v246y2026i3p261-280n1004.html

HOP – An Occupational Indicator for the Potential of Working from Home

Author

Listed:
  • Bruns Franziska

    (University of Bamberg, Margaretendamm 36, 96052 Bamberg, Germany)

  • Matthes Britta

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Regensburger Straße 100, 90478 Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Stops Michael

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Regensburger Straße 100, 90478 Nuremberg, Germany)

Abstract

Working from home (hereinafter referred to as WFH) is becoming increasingly important as the growing availability of modern information and communication technologies enables many employees to decide where (and when) they work. Nevertheless, certain occupations cannot be undertaken outside of the workplace. Work relying on digital devices such as smartphones or laptops and an internet connection can be done relatively easily from home. WFH is hardly possiblein occupations that require social proximity or physical presence (e.g. to monitor and control machines, systems or devices, or to provide services to people). If the potential for WFH in an occupation is not considered, analyses of the actual use of WFH and its impact on employment or wages, will lead to biased estimates. There are other indicators for the potential of WFH in occupations. However, we see the necessity for an indicator that meets the following four criteria is apparent. First, given that respondents’ subjective assessments of their ability to WFH are inherently linked to their normative beliefs and personal preferences, the indicator should be based on objective, rather than subjective, assessments. Second, the possibility for WFH does not depend directly on the job tasks, but rather on whether the working conditions of the occupation allow a comparable working environment to be set up in a location other than the designated workplace. Third, it is essential to avoid categorising occupations as either completely suitable or unsuitable for WFH, given that working conditions in all occupations render WFH more or less probable. Fourth, this implies that not only the presence of selected (appropriate) working conditions, but the evaluation of all typical working conditions in an occupation is necessary to determine whether an occupation can be performed from home. In this paper, we, therefore, develop a novel indicator for occupation-specific WFH potential, which we call ‘Home Office Potential’, short HOP. HOP indicates for each occupation, relative to all others, whether it is possible to set up a work environment other than the designated workplace. HOP, thus, complements other WFH indicators that are based on subjective assessments of respondents or on information on tasks performed at work. To this end, we utilise information on working conditions from the German expert database BERUFENET. We provide the HOP for aggregates according to the Classification of Occupations in Germany (KldB-2010) and the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08). Information on the WFH potential for up to 1,200 occupational units is available, thus demonstrating a significant advantage of using expert data as opposed to survey data. To assess the construct validity, a range of analyses were conducted. The findings of these analyses demonstrate that HOP is appropriate for evaluating the feasibility of working from home in a given occupation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruns Franziska & Matthes Britta & Stops Michael, 2026. "HOP – An Occupational Indicator for the Potential of Working from Home," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 246(3), pages 261-280.
  • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:246:y:2026:i:3:p:261-280:n:1004
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2025-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2025-0014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2025-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:246:y:2026:i:3:p:261-280:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.