IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Active Auditors viewpoints in Public and Private Sector over Determining Basic Materiality Levels in Auditing


  • Ali Asghar Farajzadeh
  • Tahereh Azizzadeh


Materiality is a threshold quality in accounting which has priority over other qualitative characteristics of financial information. In other word, financial information are important in decision-making only when they are important with respect to this to definition, omission or altering these significant information can change the judgments and decisions of logical user over the affairs of a business entity. The purpose of this research was to identify the auditors` ideas in private and public sector over basic materiality levels and compare the perspective of these two groups over these levels. The statistical population of this research is managers in auditing firm, partners in auditing institutions. According to Kukran formula, the sample volumes of this research are 84 people. The results indicate that, there is a meaningful difference between high and low important levels from the viewpoint of active auditors in private and public sectors. This means that there is no consensus between these two groups in determining high materiality level. In other words, in determining the low important level, the average viewpoint of auditors in auditing organization in relation to private sector is minimum. We concluded that public sector's auditors are more conservative than the ones in private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Asghar Farajzadeh & Tahereh Azizzadeh, 2012. "Comparing Active Auditors viewpoints in Public and Private Sector over Determining Basic Materiality Levels in Auditing," Journal of Global Economy, Research Centre for Social Sciences,Mumbai, India, vol. 8(1), pages 33-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:jge:journl:814

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Only to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Not freely downloadable

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Public accounts; auditors; public sector; private sector;

    JEL classification:

    • H8 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jge:journl:814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dr J K Sachdeva). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.