IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v9y2020i5p283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Anatomy of Persistence: Remediation and Science Identity Perceptions in Undergraduate Anatomy and Physiology

Author

Listed:
  • Emily A. Royse
  • Elliot Sutton
  • Melanie E. Peffer
  • Emily A. Holt

Abstract

Undergraduate Anatomy and Physiology (A&P) courses are gateway courses nursing and allied health students must pass before progressing through their academic programs. Many students need to retake the course to receive grades acceptable to progress in their programs, but identifying students at risk of failure may help instructors extend support. In this study, we examined self-efficacy and science identity as potential predictors of student success in these courses, and, by extension, a potential way to identify students at risk of failing. We found that science identity, and not self-efficacy nor completion of science prerequisite courses, explained the most variance when predicting A&P final grade in hierarchical regression. Additionally, we interviewed a purposive sample of students retaking the course to explore their experiences and perceptions of these constructs in A&P over multiple enrollments. Students retaking the course described their experiences of being “biology people†in their interviews, further suggesting that having a science identity is relevant to A&P students and may be leveraged to support students in A&P contexts.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Emily A. Royse & Elliot Sutton & Melanie E. Peffer & Emily A. Holt, 2020. "The Anatomy of Persistence: Remediation and Science Identity Perceptions in Undergraduate Anatomy and Physiology," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(5), pages 283-283, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/18275/11403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/18275
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Vitali & Conner Blackmore & Siavash Mortazavi & Ryan Anderton, 2020. "Tertiary Anatomy and Physiology, A Barrier for Student Success," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 289-289, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harrison Whiting & Conner Blackmore & Julian Vitali & Tracey Langfield & Kay Colthorpe & Hardy Ernst & Louise Ainscough, 2022. "Theories of Blended Learning: A Novel Approach to Tertiary Neuroanatomy," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 191-191, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.