IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v8y2019i1p133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of Biology Instructors on Using Student Evaluations to Inform Their Teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Genevieve Newton
  • Kim Poung
  • Amar Laila
  • Zoe Bye
  • William Bettger
  • Karl Cottenie
  • John Dawson
  • Steffen Graether
  • Shoshanah Jacobs
  • Coral Murrant
  • John Zettel

Abstract

Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) provide both summative and formative feedback. Although it is clear that SETs are used by administrators for summative purposes, such as providing data to support personnel decisions, it is uncertain how instructors use them for formative development such as to inform overall teaching practice. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency and nature of SET use for formative purposes, to explore the perception of SET utility to inform teaching practice, and to determine how perception of SET utility might be improved to enhance its use in a formative context. Participants were all biological sciences instructors at a large, research-intensive University. This research was conducted in two phases, using a combination of focus groups, interviews, and a survey to yield both qualitative and quantitative data. We found that while instructors generally perceive that SET feedback has formative utility, and that most instructors have used SET feedback for formative purposes at some point, there are many elements of SET administration that they are dissatisfied with, and they suggest several ways in which SETs could be improved (such as allowing in class time for SET administration or doing multiple administrations per semester) to yield more useable feedback that could inform their teaching. The results of this study can be used to further inform the ongoing debate about the role that SETs should play in higher education, as they demonstrate both the utility and concerns about using SETs for formative purposes.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Genevieve Newton & Kim Poung & Amar Laila & Zoe Bye & William Bettger & Karl Cottenie & John Dawson & Steffen Graether & Shoshanah Jacobs & Coral Murrant & John Zettel, 2019. "Perception of Biology Instructors on Using Student Evaluations to Inform Their Teaching," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 133-133, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/14851/9219
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/14851
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.