IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v7y2018i2p210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinions of Middle School Students on the Justice Concept within the Framework of Social Studies Education

Author

Listed:
  • Sibel Oguz Hacat

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of middle school students about the justice concept.  The study was carried out in accordance with the document review technique, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study group consists of 82 students attend in 7th grade receiving education at a middle school in the city of Kastamonu in the school year 2016-2017. Data was obtained using semi-structured interviews consisting of open-ended questions. This data was interpreted using content analysis and by way of coding. Middle school students’ opinions on justice concept are represented in 8 different categories and they use 7 different sayings relating to the justice concept. Whereas the justice concept is most often explained as “Rightfulness†, it is least often conceived as “Abstinence from Committing Crimes†. It is observed that the saying “Justice can do what swords cannot†is used by middle school students most often, and the saying “No merit can be more noble than justice†least often. In light of this information, middle school students can be provided with environments in which they can internalize the justice concept. Furthermore, results about justice can be drawn when its content is broadened. We can do scientific study about justice in more detail by increasing sample group.

Suggested Citation

  • Sibel Oguz Hacat, 2018. "Opinions of Middle School Students on the Justice Concept within the Framework of Social Studies Education," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 210-210, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/13261/8252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/13261
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.